Disadvantages and advantages of having only one child. Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages?
It is true that adults are likely to have only one child due to some restrictions on giving birth policy. This essay will argue that the disadvantages of this phenomenon are eclipsed by the advantages involved.
It is undeniable that having only one child can be disadvantageous to a certain extent. Chief among these is that children could be selfish when they become more mature. The reason for this is having only one child prevents children from learning how to share or to be tolerant which they would learn from having siblings. For instance, parents might teach their children to be tolerant and to behave well after they came into a fight with their brother or sister in order to make them kind people in the future. Furthermore, this phenomenon may cause some stresses or depressions of children as they do not have anyone who is like-minded to them to share their opinions, given that their parents could not understand them in all cases. Therefore, by having only one child, parents could lead to some negative impacts on their child.
Nevertheless, I believe that this development can offer some benefits that could far outweigh the aforementioned disadvantage. Regarding the first advantage, a child can be fully developed and looked after by their parents. This is because parents may guide a child more sufficiently than parents having two or three children do. Additionally, young parents can also be beneficial from this phenomenon. Given that the price of education is so enormously expensive that the affordability of it can sometimes be impossible when they have more than a child. Thus, having only one child not only brings about advantages to the children’s progress but also helps parents save a great deal of money for their retirement.
In conclusion, having only one child can have several drawbacks. However, this phenomenon produces some positive impacts which are of greater significance.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-06 | nhatkhang111 | 78 | view |
| 2024-10-24 | linh allie | 89 | view |
| 2024-10-24 | linh allie | 84 | view |
| 2024-10-17 | hahoaan | 89 | view |
| 2024-10-01 | tata | 11 | view |
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- Urban areas are witnessing an increase in obesity among children What are reasons Suggest some solutions 73
- The graph below shows the amounts of waste produced by three companies over a period of 15 years 67
- More and more people are migrating to cities in search of a better life but city life can be extremely difficult Explain some of the difficulties of living in a city How can governments make urban life better for everyone 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, however, if, look, may, nevertheless, regarding, so, therefore, thus, well, for instance, in conclusion, in all cases, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 7.30460921844 192% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 24.0651302605 154% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1610.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 316.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09493670886 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21620550194 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82421062929 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.518987341772 0.561755894193 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 504.0 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.1999348958 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.625 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.75 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0 7.06120827912 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.319462546057 0.244688304435 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.119413172363 0.084324248473 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.108487445079 0.0667982634062 162% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.219772121492 0.151304729494 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0495874309814 0.056905535591 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.0946893788 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.53 8.58950901804 88% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 78.4519038076 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.