With the global rise in divorce rates, people believe that closeness in families is reduced remarkably. Although one cannot judge the amount of love a family shares by general calibers, the common causes behind the increase in separation rates among families will be discussed in this essay along with some solutions.
One of the most critical causes of shattering married life is underage marriage. Often, teenage marriages are the majority ones which result into divorce because the age where children should be considerate towards their financial dependences or career life, they are getting married, and later, because of poor financial conditions, marriages have to be called-off. For instance, family breakdown rates is highest in western countries and about 70 percent of them is a result of premature marriage.
The other often mentioned cause is busy lifestyle of married couples. Nowadays, both husband and wife have to engage in work to sustain their expanses. Due to their austere routines, they do not usually have the time to talk to each other or with their children. This miscommunication is another prevalent cause of disparagement in families. Children often have to pent up their emotions and as a result, they forget how to talk to their parents. Also, psychologists believe that nowadays, people have lost the tolerance or the desire to listen to others. This leads to misunderstandings among people, which breaks their relationships.
For the problems, there are always solutions. Referring to underage marriages, teenagers should undergo counselling once they hit certain age, i.e, 18-20 years. This can help them to priortise the things that will be helpful for them in future, like, self dependence, monetary stabilisation etc. They can be taught about the perfect age to get married so that it would not result into inefficaciousness. Other solution is that people should understand that altercations in relationships are normal and they should be willing to listen to each other's point of view. People have to comprehending towards each other and this, again, can be achieved through counselling. Also, parents should be considerate towards their childrens's mental health. They should always spare some time daily to talk to them about their day and life, or, plan some trips every weekend.
To summarise, there are many adversities that can result into family breakdown, such as miscommunication and misunderstanding; however, there are also tools to reduce these issues. Mainly, spending more time with each other and counselling is necessary and doable.
- Nowadays some people tend to take temporary jobs for they have the time to do other things Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 73
- The plans below show the site of an airport now and how it will look after redevelopment next year Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- Some people believe that professionals such as doctors and engineers should be required to work in the country where they did their training Others believe they should be free to work in another country if they wish Discuss both views and give your own op 73
- Some people claim that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their waste 78
- In some countries people are now buying fewer new things and buying more second hand things instead In your opinion what are some possible reasons for this Is this a positive or negative trend 73
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 235, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...he things that will be helpful for them in future, like, self dependence, monetary stabil...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 573, Rule ID: NEED_TO_VBG[1]
Message: Did you mean 'have to comprehend'?
Suggestion: have to comprehend
...en to each others point of view. People have to comprehending towards each other and this, again, can...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, so, for instance, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 13.1623246493 167% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 24.0651302605 141% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 57.0 41.998997996 136% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2191.0 1615.20841683 136% => OK
No of words: 407.0 315.596192385 129% => OK
Chars per words: 5.38329238329 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49157444576 4.20363070211 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9262888948 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 221.0 176.041082164 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.542997542998 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 676.8 506.74238477 134% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 16.0721442886 137% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.5090311004 49.4020404114 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.5909090909 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.59090909091 7.06120827912 37% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 3.4128256513 264% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.213690513592 0.244688304435 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0587775360811 0.084324248473 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0566112275752 0.0667982634062 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130768073108 0.151304729494 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0923006850097 0.056905535591 162% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.92 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.72 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 78.4519038076 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 235, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...he things that will be helpful for them in future, like, self dependence, monetary stabil...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 573, Rule ID: NEED_TO_VBG[1]
Message: Did you mean 'have to comprehend'?
Suggestion: have to comprehend
...en to each others point of view. People have to comprehending towards each other and this, again, can...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, so, for instance, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 13.1623246493 167% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 24.0651302605 141% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 57.0 41.998997996 136% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2191.0 1615.20841683 136% => OK
No of words: 407.0 315.596192385 129% => OK
Chars per words: 5.38329238329 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49157444576 4.20363070211 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9262888948 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 221.0 176.041082164 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.542997542998 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 676.8 506.74238477 134% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 16.0721442886 137% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.5090311004 49.4020404114 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.5909090909 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.59090909091 7.06120827912 37% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 3.4128256513 264% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.213690513592 0.244688304435 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0587775360811 0.084324248473 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0566112275752 0.0667982634062 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130768073108 0.151304729494 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0923006850097 0.056905535591 162% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.92 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.72 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 78.4519038076 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.