The importance of card less society, has always been debatable, has now upsurged a lot of argument in favor and against it, thus it has become more controversial. The substantial influence of chip card less nation has sparked the controversy over the potential impact of this trend in an integral part of the society in recent years. It can be agreed that upside of not using key card is instrumental indeed, however, it has been some drawbacks as well. This essay will elaborate both assertions and will provide a well weighed conclusion.
At the outset, there are numerous reasons how platinum card less society is unreservedly salient, but most conspicuous one lies in the fact that people tend to choose cards over cash as they are easy to carry everywhere. Affinity cards, for instance, lightweight and can stored all cash in only one bank card. Therefore, it is a vital time for people to appreciate the significance of using cards for the overall amelioration of society.
However, there are some people who choose to think differently and hold an opposing view point which can certainly overwhelm the potential influence of simple card. Nevertheless, the contradiction is rooted in the fact that having cash is much easier to use than credit cards as not every inhabitant is educated and familiar with cards. For example, old age people are not habitual of using ATM. Hence, it is apparent the downside of reward cards cannot be overlooked.
The above presented dissertation illustrates both perspectives about the impact of chip cards less nation, while it is evident that it has various benefits, although it's deleterious effects cannot be ignored and have to be well addressed and well balanced against it's merits.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, however, if, look, nevertheless, so, therefore, thus, well, while, for example, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1454.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 287.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.06620209059 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11595363751 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79932577477 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 176.041082164 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.585365853659 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 455.4 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.3412019409 49.4020404114 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.166666667 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.9166666667 20.7667163134 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.66666666667 7.06120827912 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.15686980903 0.244688304435 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0561949705952 0.084324248473 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0380722335732 0.0667982634062 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0932027400656 0.151304729494 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.02752526163 0.056905535591 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.12 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.