In this sophisticated era, there are plenty of things happen or can be supposed. Card less society can be assumed as realistic or could be contradicted. However, it might has overwhelmed pros over it's cons. In thesis, I will discuss both assertions about digital transactions and provide a generalized nutshell.
To initiate with, online spending wealth over using card transaction is itself a blessing. Electric payments are more convenient rather than carry a card everywhere. For instance, having card with you everywhere is more pathetic than doing online shopping. Therefore, folks should need to ameliorate the society with make some experiments in every month/year for the development of the nation.
Having a contradicting side in the notion upholding a opposing viewpoint on affinity card less society, more people are not familiar with e-shopping, digital payments so they habitual to carry card to make their life more comfy. Hence, it is so obvious that downside of platinum cards cannot be overlooked.
To put both perspective in conclusion, about not to use cards much in daily routine is not so required. While it is unreservedly salient that its boon are balancing it's demerits as well. It can be said by determining that it has more benefits than having causes.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 129, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...g. Electric payments are more convenient rather than carry a card everywhere. For...
^^
Line 5, column 53, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...tradicting side in the notion upholding a opposing viewpoint on affinity card les...
^
Line 5, column 270, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...Hence, it is so obvious that downside of platinum cards cannot be overlooked. ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, however, if, look, so, therefore, well, while, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 41.998997996 60% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1081.0 1615.20841683 67% => OK
No of words: 207.0 315.596192385 66% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.22222222222 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79308509922 4.20363070211 90% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94097773592 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 133.0 176.041082164 76% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.642512077295 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 343.8 506.74238477 68% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.3527033292 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.1538461538 106.682146367 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.9230769231 20.7667163134 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.23076923077 7.06120827912 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.159511304085 0.244688304435 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0528650661433 0.084324248473 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.061755551428 0.0667982634062 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0891427576006 0.151304729494 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0370569537998 0.056905535591 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.0946893788 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 47.79 50.2224549098 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.7 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.26 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 78.4519038076 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 9.78957915832 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.