Doing an enjoyable activity with a child can be better for their overall skills development and creativity than reading. To what extend do you agree?
There is a growing belief that engaging in enjoyable activities with children can have a more significant impact on their overall skills development and creativity than simply reading with them. I fully agree with this notion and believe that active participation in interactive and stimulating tasks can foster a broader range of skills and enhance creativity in children.
When children engage in activities such as drawing, painting, building, or playing games, they are actively using their imagination, problem-solving abilities, and fine motor skills. These activities require them to think creatively, make decisions, and explore different possibilities. For example, when a child builds a tower using blocks, they are not only developing their spatial awareness and hand-eye coordination but also thinking critically about how to balance the blocks and create a stable structure.
On the other hand, reading primarily focuses on language skills, vocabulary development, and comprehension. While reading is undoubtedly essential for children's literacy and language acquisition, it may not provide the same level of holistic development as hands-on activities. Reading allows children to expand their knowledge, improve their language skills, and gain exposure to various ideas and perspectives. However, it does not engage them in the same active and interactive manner that other activities do.
Moreover, when children participate in enjoyable activities with adults or peers, they also learn valuable social skills, such as communication, teamwork, and sharing. They learn to negotiate, express their ideas, and collaborate with others to achieve common goals. These skills are crucial for their overall development and future success in various social settings.
In conclusion, while reading is undeniably important for children's cognitive and language development, engaging in enjoyable activities can offer a more comprehensive and multifaceted approach to skills development and creativity. By actively participating in hands-on tasks, children not only enhance their cognitive abilities but also develop social skills and foster their imagination. Therefore, I strongly believe that doing enjoyable activities with children can be more beneficial for their overall skills development and creativity than solely relying on reading.
- Doing an enjoyable activity with a child can be better for their overall skills development and creativity than reading To what extend do you agree 78
- some people believe that children of all ages should have extra responsibilities for example helping at home or at work Others believe that outside of school children should be free to enjoy their lives Discuss both views and give your own opinion 92
- Some people believe that the experiences children have before they go to school will have the greatest effect on their future life Others argue that experiences gained when they are teenagers have a bigger influence Discuss both views and give your own op 78
- Some people say that to prevent illness and disease governments should focus more on reducing environmental population and housing problems To what extend do you agree or disagree 73
- Doctors should be responsible for educating their patients about how to improve their health To what extend do you agree or disagree 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, while, for example, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 25.0 10.4138276553 240% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2021.0 1615.20841683 125% => OK
No of words: 337.0 315.596192385 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.99703264095 5.12529762239 117% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28457229495 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07094280521 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.540059347181 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 626.4 506.74238477 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 7.0 0.809619238477 865% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.9816123195 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.733333333 106.682146367 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4666666667 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.66666666667 7.06120827912 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.387765049153 0.244688304435 158% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.140665986198 0.084324248473 167% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.111347631019 0.0667982634062 167% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.229239854783 0.151304729494 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.110554975318 0.056905535591 194% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.1 13.0946893788 138% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 23.77 50.2224549098 47% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 11.3001002004 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.82 12.4159519038 144% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.6 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 78.4519038076 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.