Some people say that to prevent illness and disease, governments should focus more on reducing environmental population and housing problems. To what extend do you agree or disagree?
There is a growing opinion that in order to combat illness and disease effectively, governments should place greater emphasis on addressing environmental, population, and housing issues. I strongly agree with this viewpoint. By tackling these underlying factors, governments can significantly mitigate the spread of diseases and promote public health.
Reducing environmental problems, such as pollution and inadequate sanitation, is crucial. These factors contribute to the transmission of various diseases, including respiratory and waterborne illnesses. For instance, air pollution from industrial emissions and vehicle exhaust can lead to respiratory problems and increase the risk of respiratory infections. By implementing strict environmental regulations and promoting sustainable practices, governments can create cleaner and healthier living environments, thereby reducing the prevalence of diseases.
Moreover, population density and overcrowded housing conditions play a significant role in the spread of contagious diseases. When people live in close proximity to each other, the likelihood of transmission increases. For instance, highly populated urban areas often experience outbreaks of diseases like influenza and tuberculosis due to the ease of transmission in crowded spaces. Governments should prioritize urban planning and housing policies that promote adequate spacing, ventilation, and sanitation to reduce the risk of disease transmission.
Addressing these environmental, population, and housing problems requires comprehensive strategies and collaboration between governments, communities, and relevant stakeholders. Efforts should include implementing effective waste management systems, promoting sustainable transportation, ensuring access to clean water and sanitation facilities, and providing affordable and safe housing options.
In conclusion, focusing on reducing environmental, population, and housing problems is paramount to prevent illness and disease. By addressing these root causes, governments can create healthier environments that minimize the risk of disease transmission and improve public health outcomes. It is imperative for governments to prioritize these issues and allocate resources accordingly to protect the well-being of their populations.
- Many governments think that economic progress is their most important goal Some people however think that other types of progress are equally important for a country Discuss both views and give your own opinion 78
- Some people say that to prevent illness and disease governments should focus more on reducing environmental population and housing problems To what extend do you agree or disagree 73
- Many governments think that economic progress is their most important goal Some people however think that other types of progress are equally important for a country Discuss both views and give your own opinion 78
- Doctors should be responsible for educating their patients about how to improve their health To what extend do you agree or disagree 73
- Doing an enjoyable activity with a child can be better for their overall skills development and creativity than reading To what extend do you agree 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 147, Rule ID: CLOSE_SCRUTINY[1]
Message: Use simply 'proximity'.
Suggestion: proximity
...ontagious diseases. When people live in close proximity to each other, the likelihood of transm...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, but, if, moreover, so, well, for instance, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 23.0 10.4138276553 221% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2010.0 1615.20841683 124% => OK
No of words: 299.0 315.596192385 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.72240802676 5.12529762239 131% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1583189471 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.41461580899 2.80592935109 122% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.598662207358 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 612.9 506.74238477 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 2.0 1.60771543086 124% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 0.809619238477 741% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.3406116754 49.4020404114 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.625 106.682146367 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6875 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.875 7.06120827912 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.248894774696 0.244688304435 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.077282308183 0.084324248473 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0606167483951 0.0667982634062 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132194626239 0.151304729494 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.041642916201 0.056905535591 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.6 13.0946893788 150% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 19.37 50.2224549098 39% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 21.7 12.4159519038 175% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.18 8.58950901804 130% => OK
difficult_words: 126.0 78.4519038076 161% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 22.0 10.7795591182 204% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.