Doing an enjoyable activity with a child can be better for their overall skills development and creativity than reading. To what extend do you agree?
Engaging in enjoyable activities with a child can have a more significant impact on their overall skills development and creativity compared to reading. While reading plays a crucial role in language acquisition and knowledge expansion, active participation in interactive activities offers a holistic approach to a child's development.
On one hand, reading exposes children to a wide range of vocabulary, concepts, and narratives. Through reading, children can enhance their language skills, comprehension abilities, and imagination. They can explore different worlds and cultures, fostering empathy and understanding. Reading also stimulates cognitive development, critical thinking, and analytical skills. For instance, reading a complex story can challenge a child's problem-solving abilities as they analyze the plot and character motivations.
On the other hand, engaging in interactive activities provides children with hands-on learning experiences. Activities like art projects, building blocks, or pretend play promote motor skills, creativity, and problem-solving. When children actively participate in these activities, they can explore, experiment, and express their ideas freely. For example, constructing a model using building blocks enhances spatial awareness, coordination, and logical thinking. Engaging in art projects encourages self-expression, imagination, and fine motor skills.
Moreover, interactive activities offer opportunities for social interaction and emotional development. Collaborative activities like team sports or group projects help children develop communication skills, teamwork, and empathy. By working together, children learn to respect others' ideas and perspectives. Reading, although it can evoke emotions and empathy through storytelling, often lacks the immediate social and emotional engagement that interactive activities provide.
In conclusion, while reading is vital for language development and expanding knowledge, engaging in enjoyable activities with a child offers a more comprehensive approach to their overall skills development and creativity. Reading provides linguistic and cognitive benefits, while interactive activities foster motor skills, creativity, problem-solving, and social-emotional development. Therefore, a balanced approach that combines reading and interactive activities can optimize a child's holistic growth.
- Doing an enjoyable activity with a child can be better for their overall skills development and creativity than reading To what extend do you agree 67
- companies should provide sports facilities for local communities To what extend do you agree 73
- Many governments think that economic progress is their most important goal Some people however think that other types of progress are equally important for a country Discuss both views and give your own opinion 89
- companies should provide sports facilities for local communities To what extend do you agree 73
- Some people believe that the experiences children have before they go to school will have the greatest effect on their future life Others argue that experiences gained when they are teenagers have a bigger influence Discuss both views and give your own op 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, moreover, so, therefore, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 13.1623246493 8% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 24.0 10.4138276553 230% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 41.998997996 64% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2089.0 1615.20841683 129% => OK
No of words: 311.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 6.71704180064 5.12529762239 131% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19942759058 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.40947321508 2.80592935109 122% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.572347266881 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 643.5 506.74238477 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 2.1 1.60771543086 131% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 10.0 0.809619238477 1235% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.1347027669 49.4020404114 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.947368421 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.3684210526 20.7667163134 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.31578947368 7.06120827912 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 8.67935871743 184% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.252519541965 0.244688304435 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0837188309196 0.084324248473 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0867010377894 0.0667982634062 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.168149512566 0.151304729494 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0884963672983 0.056905535591 156% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.4 13.0946893788 141% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 12.94 50.2224549098 26% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 11.3001002004 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 21.4 12.4159519038 172% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.68 8.58950901804 124% => OK
difficult_words: 123.0 78.4519038076 157% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.