Due to science and technology people around the world are living similar lifestyle Do you think it is a positive or negative development ？
As different parts of the world increasingly interconnected, people living in different regions or parts of the world actually are having similar lifestyles. They grab a coffee in Starbucks, wear Uniqlo T-shirts, or take easy bite at McDonald's. In this positive trend? I guess not.
True, globalization and advance in technology allows the gap between different regions to shrink. Because of this, those in less developed countries also can buy products with high price-performance ratio and enjoy a comparatively higher life quality, compared with half a century ago. In addition, with the widespread use of Instagram and Facebook, these people can also follow the latest trend of fashion ongoing in the world. Social media and easy access to affordable international brands seemed to make people's life better and more comfortable. There is another side of this phenomenon, however.
First, cultural richness and diversity as well as the manifestations of local characters are in sad disappearance. Undeniably local cultures are inextricably bound up in its local commodities or handmade artifacts but with things like fast fashion brands advancing in almost every corner of the world local artifacts are outcompeted, which contributes to the sad loss of cultural diversity. KFC mugs can be easily found in different cities but a special bowl made of wood cannot in Japan. Plus in this increasingly similar world, strong cultures such as western cultures invades weaker ones causing the uniformity of values and further loss of creativity. Children in Asia or USA who easily sing the songs of Black Pink, a hit K-pop girls band, or chase the news of NBA All-Star players, might not be aware of their national heroes in the field of science, literature, art or humanity. The less inspiration from such influential patriots leads to children’s less motivation of bringing a difference to their own country. This can be a worrying trend to the less developed parts of the world.
Therefore, in general, I don't think it's still wise to remain optimistic to see that with the rapid growth in science and technology the world is becoming increasingly similar.
- University should require every student to take a variety of courses outside the student s field of study 50
- Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like Others believe that they should be only allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future such as those related to science and technology Discuss both these views and 84
- Studies suggest that children spend more time watching TV than they did in the past and spend less on doing active or creative things Why do you think it is the case What measures and methods can be used to tackle with it
- Some people claim that a nation s government should preserve its wilderness areas in their natural state Others argue that these areas should be developed for potential economic gain Write a response in which you discuss which view more closely aligns wit 83
- Due to science and technology people around the world are living similar lifestyle Do you think it is a positive or negative development 89
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 8, column 26, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
... the world. Therefore, in general, I dont think its still wise to remain optimist...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, however, if, so, still, therefore, well, i guess, in addition, in general, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 10.4138276553 173% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 41.998997996 133% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1939.0 1615.20841683 120% => OK
No of words: 371.0 315.596192385 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.22641509434 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38877662729 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98492907542 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 221.0 176.041082164 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.595687331536 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 601.2 506.74238477 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 78.8550419888 49.4020404114 160% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.058823529 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8235294118 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.17647058824 7.06120827912 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.30543599929 0.244688304435 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0752529008472 0.084324248473 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.155413329305 0.0667982634062 233% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.289760156205 0.151304729494 192% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.358057618619 0.056905535591 629% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.72 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 8, column 26, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
... the world. Therefore, in general, I dont think its still wise to remain optimist...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, however, if, so, still, therefore, well, i guess, in addition, in general, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 10.4138276553 173% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 41.998997996 133% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1939.0 1615.20841683 120% => OK
No of words: 371.0 315.596192385 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.22641509434 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38877662729 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98492907542 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 221.0 176.041082164 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.595687331536 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 601.2 506.74238477 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 78.8550419888 49.4020404114 160% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.058823529 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8235294118 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.17647058824 7.06120827912 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.30543599929 0.244688304435 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0752529008472 0.084324248473 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.155413329305 0.0667982634062 233% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.289760156205 0.151304729494 192% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.358057618619 0.056905535591 629% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.72 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.