To ease traffic problems, people are encouraged to live close to their workplaces/schools. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
In this day and age, it is argued by many people that the best solution to reduce traffic problems is encouraging people to move closer to their workplaces. In my opinion, I totally agree with this notion as it would have the desired effect in making cities more livable.
To begin with, the transportation problems come from some sources, such as public transportations, private vehicles, and many more; but most of the time, these troubles result from the increasing number of employees' vehicles. For example, peak hour traffic is undoubtedly made up largely of staff from companies going to and from home. Therefore, if the number of workers’ vehicles is reduced on city streets, a large percentage of traffic will obviously decline in rush hours. One of the most effective ways to do this is by encouraging staff to live in places near their workplaces. this will need them to walk or ride a bicycle to go to work as they do not want to spend their precious time taking out a motorbike or a car just to go for a small distance.
In addition, if the demand for using cars is reduced, manufacturers will not have the motivation to produce, which can limit the amount of polluting emissions. Moreover, although automobiles are more helpful in terms of saving time, yet cycling and walking are far more beneficial in the long run. they often need a lot of energy expenditure, which can help to burn extra calories, thus, providing long-term health benefits to the people. For example, according to a survey, about 50% of people in Japan reach their offices via pedaling and walking, so they stay physically fit.
In conclusion, it is undeniable that we can reduce many traffic problems by spurring citizens to live close to their workplaces. Not only does this can help to improve the problems causing by personal vehicles but also boost workers’ health.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-10-07 | chibavangngoc | 89 | view |
- Families who send their children to private schools should not be required to pay taxes that support the state education system To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 56
- To ease traffic problems people are encouraged to live close to their workplaces schools To what extent do you agree or disagree with this Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience 89
- Families who send their children to private schools should not be required to pay taxes that support the state education system To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 586, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...o live in places near their workplaces. this will need them to walk or ride a bicycl...
^^^^
Line 11, column 299, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: They
...re far more beneficial in the long run. they often need a lot of energy expenditure,...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, moreover, so, therefore, thus, for example, in addition, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 41.998997996 129% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1573.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 319.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.93103448276 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22617688928 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7322837976 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.595611285266 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 479.7 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.0363406005 49.4020404114 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.0 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5384615385 20.7667163134 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.53846153846 7.06120827912 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.19694302809 0.244688304435 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0695136113467 0.084324248473 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0507705745189 0.0667982634062 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122148119925 0.151304729494 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0515122996671 0.056905535591 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 50.2224549098 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.61 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.69 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.