Email is a fast and convenient way to communicate, and written letters aren't needed anymore.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
Sustainable development in communication facilities enables rapid and qualitative interaction among families and acquaintances. Undoubtedly, the issue of e-mails dominance in communication generates heated debates, with some people sticking to the idea of the disappearance of written letters. Although writing a paper letter nowadays can be called an extraordinary act, an e-mail received swiftly is more likely to obtain in modern world.
On the one hand, longhands provide a real delight to any recipient of the letter because of the sense of purpose. Written letters are widely distributed among the elders, so the messages from their children and grandchildren secure the link between generations. Reading a hand-written text feels more personal and even emotional, as if letters conveyed the mood of the author. For example, my grandparents usually send us reports about their life and receiving these kinds of messages is much more satisfying than impersonal online words. Thus, demand for longhands retains high and allows relatives of various age remain close relations.
On the other hand, increased prevalence of e-mails cannot be described fortuitous. Electronic messages have become more preferable to share the information rapidly and without intermediaries. What is more, any sender will have no doubts about obtaining of the information because of special notifications. For example, using WhatsApp a person will spend approximately a couple of minutes on texting, directing and enjoying the result. In other words, e-mails can be recognized as progress in sending letters.
To sum up, receiving paper letters may be amazing and delightful, but the advantages of electronic means of communication will definitely outweigh as people in the modern world are sure to choose swiftness and reliability.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-05-20 | SUSANNA PETROSYAN | 11 | view |
| 2019-12-12 | SUSANNA PETROSYAN | 57 | view |
- Motor vehicle crashes are one of the leading causes of teen deaths To prevent such road accidents the government should ban people under 24 to drive motorcycles To what extent do you agree or disagree 96
- The best way to travel is travel in a group led by a tour guide To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 89
- Sometimes spouses have to live far away from each other Maintaining a long distance relationship is sometimes difficult and straining What do you think are the main reasons of long distance relationships What can be done to help couples feel closer 89
- Some parents buy their children whatever they ask for and allow their children to do whatever they want Is this a good way to raise children What consequences could this style of parenting have for children as they get older 60
- Technology provides us a lot of means to communicate But now that people have the ability to talk to each other in a wider variety of methods our communication and social abilities have taken a step back Why does technological advance hurt nontechnical co 97
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, may, so, thus, for example, no doubt, in other words, to sum up, what is more, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 7.30460921844 0% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 5.0 24.0651302605 21% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1549.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 274.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.65328467153 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0685311056 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.15489153773 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.638686131387 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 490.5 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.8115027497 49.4020404114 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.642857143 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5714285714 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.5 7.06120827912 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0630164624089 0.244688304435 26% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0209411633132 0.084324248473 25% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0240491044092 0.0667982634062 36% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0361384652787 0.151304729494 24% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0185489212369 0.056905535591 33% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 50.2224549098 70% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.49 12.4159519038 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.88 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.