Some people believe that if the staffs of particular company are required their favorite or status such as private information or hobbies, it is handy and good but the others do not accept this opinion. From my standpoint, I totally agree with the people who express the idea about it is necessary to produce their information. This essay will discuss about these opinion.
On the one hand, the employers can understand more about their staffs and can be also make a good relationship: if they get informantion about their employers are concerning such as their favorite musician or some hobbies, they can put them into a suitable location accurately. For instance, if a man staff is an introvert person, they will not let him demonstrate in front of the crowds as it will make the bad effects and can not get any benefits for the offfice also impacting to the work-efficiency.
On the other hand, some residents think that it is the best choice to protect themselves avoid from publishing the information on social media or be got out due to theh think some bad factors such as criminal can stole their private ones and lead to some blackmails... They just want the employees need the qualification or performance from them and the best attitude on working, besides that they do not want any one else making the fuss to their personal life. For example, some opponents are usually keep themselves to themselves in order to escape the uncomfort feelings between conversation of people each other.
In conclusion, some individuals are putting away the information to the employees in workplace will lead to better decision for boths. And about the people think it is a bad idea because they are scared and faced with some troubles, I agree with the first idea respectively.
- Employers sometimes ask people applying for jobs for personal information such as their hobbies and interests and whether they are married or single Some people say that this information may be relevant and useful others disagree Discuss both these views 61
- Employers sometimes ask people applying for jobs for personal information such as their hobbies and interests and whether they are married or single Some people say that this information may be relevant and useful others disagree Discuss both these views 73
- The chart below gives information on the percentage of British people giving money to charity by age range for the years 1990 and 2010 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 359, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this opinion' or 'these opinions'?
Suggestion: this opinion; these opinions
...ormation. This essay will discuss about these opinion. On the one hand, the employers can u...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 160, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
... get informantion about their employers are concerning such as their favorite musician or some...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 410, Rule ID: ANY_BODY[1]
Message: Did you mean 'anyone'?
Suggestion: anyone
... working, besides that they do not want any one else making the fuss to their personal ...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 503, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'kept'.
Suggestion: kept
...For example, some opponents are usually keep themselves to themselves in order to ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 532, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...re usually keep themselves to themselves in order to escape the uncomfort feeling...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, if, so, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 33.0 24.0651302605 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1473.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 303.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.86138613861 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17215713816 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77446872362 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.514851485149 0.561755894193 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 462.6 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 20.2975951904 148% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 67.5955619845 49.4020404114 137% => OK
Chars per sentence: 147.3 106.682146367 138% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.3 20.7667163134 146% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.3 7.06120827912 146% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.277392367151 0.244688304435 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.110519285875 0.084324248473 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.035759833524 0.0667982634062 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.168850943395 0.151304729494 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0259625433024 0.056905535591 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 13.0946893788 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.49 50.2224549098 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.5 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.51 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 78.4519038076 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.1190380762 138% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.