Employers sometimes ask people applying for jobs for personal information, such as their hobbies and interests, and whether they are married or single. Some people say that this information may be relevant and useful. others disagree.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion
It is a typical question in modern society, whether private details of a candidate, need to be listed in a resume or not. This essay will discuss both views and come to conclusion on how the non-academic facts brings negative effects or non- effect.
It is obvious that modern CVs are compact with important details such as academic qualifications, relevant experiences, achievements and goals. Many employers are keen on reading on serious facts which could show beyond the company expectations. This includes, multi-task handling, company targets and profit achievements. Reading extra details would be a headache to some employers to read when loads of applications are on the desk, In addition, some personal information, such as marriage status, skin colour, sex, religion, nationality etc., could cause the applicants to avoid from applying for certain positions. for example, hiring a coacher for a Rugger team, may have more chance for a male than a female by the sex, but the team may miss an opportunity of a high skilled, rugby lady available on the top, but not within added advantage criteria. Searching black or white, or race among the application could cost badly by losing suitable employees, and could lead to sever repercussions to the reputation of a business. In a recent survey, demonstrates that workers with multi cultures are more efficient than a team with same race. And businesses benefit higher profit in vast attraction between employees and customers in different nations
People who argue the opposite, claims that further facts could see the applicant in deep on their attitudes and thoughts. Recruitments are often open to a younger who does sports, when concern about physical fitness. Marriage status could be important to an entity who is keen to hire for hard or and long hours placements. But the chance where an opposition could fill could be possible, according to their interests.
In nut shell, I would keep my opinion in favour of new send in presenting curriculum vita, and recommend the employers should encourage the public to provide eye catching details on their professional suitability, through their advertisements.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-10-24 | kuriha090905 | 61 | view |
| 2021-10-24 | kuriha090905 | 73 | view |
- Employers sometimes ask people applying for jobs for personal information such as their hobbies and interests and whether they are married or single Some people say that this information may be relevant and useful others disagree Discuss both these views 89
- It is a contemporary issue that the youngers are affected by fat in their early stages This essay will look in deep the core facts for this reason and come with some important solutions to minimize the situation 56
- Some people argue that the government should give every unemployed person a mobile phone and should make sure they have access to the Internet They believe this is the best way of using public money to reduce the problem of unemployment To what extent do 84
- It is becoming more and more difficult to escape the influence of the media on our lives Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of living in a media rich society Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or e 84
- Bullying is a big problem in many schools What do you think are the causes of this What solutions can you suggest 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 620, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: For
...id from applying for certain positions. for example, hiring a coacher for a Rugger ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, may, so, for example, in addition, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1828.0 1615.20841683 113% => OK
No of words: 349.0 315.596192385 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.23782234957 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32221490584 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92923015886 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 221.0 176.041082164 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.63323782235 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 551.7 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 7.0 0.809619238477 865% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 67.2031644056 49.4020404114 136% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.571428571 106.682146367 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.9285714286 20.7667163134 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.64285714286 7.06120827912 52% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.176215155084 0.244688304435 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0483515958772 0.084324248473 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0379355138991 0.0667982634062 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0880441725147 0.151304729494 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0299105838289 0.056905535591 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.0946893788 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.41 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.85 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 78.4519038076 141% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.