The environment problems facing today's world are so great that there is little ordinary people can do to improve the situation. Governments and large companies shoul be responsible for reducing the amount of damage being done to the environment.
Environmental issue has been a great concern and controversial for so many years. It is everyones' responsibility to take care of the surroundings but there are a lot more ignorant people than those who are really worried about it. In view of this, there are some who thinks that an ordinary citizen will not be able to do something about it. Instead, government and companies should take their lead to save our world from deteriorating. In this essay I will outline two reasons why I agree with this opinion.
To begin with, environmental issue is a huge problem and that an ordinary person may not be influencial enough to cause drastic change in just a snap. There are a lot of ordinary people who does not really care about the surroundings as long as they live in comfort and mainly because of their laziness. Because of this issue, someone who is not influencial will not cause this behavior to happen overnight but with the government interfering with the issue, it may be possible. Government can just simply impose a legislation that says one should not litter or throw their trash on a proper garbage can, for instance, and they can put a fine for the violaters. People being aware of this and government being seriously strict about it will change other peoples' habit and will be cautious about their action.
In addition to that, because of peoples' ignorance, they do not really recycle things that are reusable whoch also harms the environment. Some people may recycle but for those who have resistant behavior, they will not really listen to those who does that. In this issue, a company can also aid in helping the environment. For instance, they can educate and make it mandatory for everyone to recycle their papers, not use any plastic but instead use an eco-bag or paper bag and, probably stop the use of disposable cups and provide their employees with mugs.
I appreciate others opinion saying that even an ordinary person can help alleviate environmental problem which I thinks is true but since the problem is so big and a lot of people does not care, I strongly believe that government and companies should take the lead and influence those who are ignorant to change their old habit.
Overall, an ordinary person helping to improve the issue with the environment will not be enough to cause a significant change to cure our surroundings' issue, instead government and companies should start making and imposing the change to everyone by using their influence.
- The graphs below show information about citizenship in the UK 62
- The graphs below show the size of the ozone hole over Antartica and the production of three ozone-damaging gases from 1980 to 2000. 67
- The table below shows the monthly expenditure of an average Australian family in 1991 and 2001. 73
- The graphs below show the annual expenditure of university students in three countries in 2003 33
- The graphs below ashow information about the weekly work hours in Australia in 2001 90
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 98, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rsial for so many years. It is everyones responsibility to take care of the surro...
^^
Line 3, column 491, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'cans'.
Suggestion: cans
...e issue, it may be possible. Government can just simply impose a legislation that s...
^^^
Line 7, column 114, Rule ID: NON3PRS_VERB[1]
Message: The pronoun 'I' must be used with a non-third-person form of a verb: 'think'
Suggestion: think
...alleviate environmental problem which I thinks is true but since the problem is so big...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, really, so, for instance, i think, in addition, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 20.0 7.85571142285 255% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 22.0 10.4138276553 211% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 16.0 7.30460921844 219% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 45.0 24.0651302605 187% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2069.0 1615.20841683 128% => OK
No of words: 426.0 315.596192385 135% => OK
Chars per words: 4.85680751174 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.54310108192 4.20363070211 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64356875715 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.457746478873 0.561755894193 81% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 653.4 506.74238477 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 70.527476915 49.4020404114 143% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.3125 106.682146367 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.625 20.7667163134 128% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0625 7.06120827912 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.245148004003 0.244688304435 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0902366175157 0.084324248473 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0461206955748 0.0667982634062 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.149008507151 0.151304729494 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0332914324534 0.056905535591 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 50.2224549098 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 12.4159519038 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.45 8.58950901804 87% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 78.4519038076 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.