The environmental problems that today's world is facing are so great that there is little ordinary people can do to improve the situation. So governments and large organizations should be responsible for reducing the amount of damage being done to the environment.
Nowadays, it is an irrefutable fact that rising demand for the population, modernization, and technological advancement are all accountable for bringing the whole world to the brim of suffocation by disturbing the balanced cycle of environmental processes. Most people argue that the extent of damage to the mother earth has reached a point where it can not be grappled by a single human effort instead, it has turned out to be a major issue at the global level. Although this dire situation demands worldwide attention from all the higher organizations, still the contribution of each individual to curb this devastating behavior can not be overlooked. This essay will emphasize on the importance of applying a balanced approach from both the sections to achieve a profound effect on combatting environmental problems.
The modern era has been engulfed by many environmental challenges. The technical, industrial, and agricultural revolution have played a major role in giving rise to global warming and hence resulted in depleting the Ozone layer by trapping harmful gases in our atmosphere. For example, in a recent report, it is revealed that Greenland and Antarctica ice sheets are losing ice six times faster than they were in the 1990s. The melting of ice sheets has increased the global sea level by .7 inches. Hence, a joint venture of worldwide governments is needed to gobble up this rampant situation.
However, the efficacy of an individual's contribution in this context is indispensable. The root of any problem always starts from individual grounds and treating the mother earth as their own responsibility can help to overcome this issue to a greater extent. For instance, raising voice against deforestation and minimizing the use of private vehicles can help to mitigate the effects of environmental problems. So, in order to save this natural treasure, an effort is crucial at human grounds.
To conclude, our environment is under tremendous threat of getting extinct. Many argue on the role of governments and a single individual in overcoming this risk. However, I think that collaborative action is required if we want to save our environment and its resources for our upcoming generations.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-08-15 | Sanaullah97 | 78 | view |
| 2021-08-15 | Sanaullah97 | 73 | view |
| 2021-08-15 | Sanaullah97 | 73 | view |
| 2021-01-13 | nam.phanthanh97 | 61 | view |
| 2021-01-09 | Huy Do | 78 | view |
- 82
- The bar chart shows the percentage of households with cars in a European country between 1972 and 2001 56
- The chart below shows the amount of money per person per week spent on fast foods mainly on three income groups in Britain The graph shows the trends in the consumption of fast foods from 1970 to 1990 Write a report for a university lecturer describing th 84
- 59
- Some people believe the aim of University education is to help graduates get better jobs Others believe there are much wider benefits of UNiversity education for both individuals and society Discuss both the views and give your opinion 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 29, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'individuals'' or 'individual's'?
Suggestion: individuals'; individual's
...tuation. However, the efficacy of an individuals contribution in this context is indispe...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, however, if, look, so, still, for example, for instance, i think
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1872.0 1615.20841683 116% => OK
No of words: 354.0 315.596192385 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.28813559322 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33761313653 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.15113975642 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 208.0 176.041082164 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.587570621469 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 588.6 506.74238477 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.7482103242 49.4020404114 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.0 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.125 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.75 7.06120827912 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.149726538197 0.244688304435 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0399618910758 0.084324248473 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0367753593971 0.0667982634062 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0777538077376 0.151304729494 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0521835947051 0.056905535591 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.4 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.81 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 114.0 78.4519038076 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 21.0 9.78957915832 215% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.