Environmental protection is the responsibility of politicians, not individuals as individuals can do too little. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Many people believe that green protection is the obligation of politicians, not personals as personals can do very small. In my view, I wholly disagree with this idea because of three main reasons that I will explain in this essay.
Firstly, I would disagree that only governments have a duty to protect environmentally because if individuals and governments do not address these problems together, is not totally finish. For example, governments promulgated a lot of laws about forest protection or other environmental issues; however, loggers still exploit them. As a result, governments cannot address all illegal deforestation for a long time until now.
Secondly, I believe that protecting the earth is the responsibility of both governments and people. For instance, governments can deal with large problems such a preventing prolonged drought or violent storms, while an individual can help in many ways such as growing plants, operating environmental protection projects and buying some energy-efficient household items. Consequently, these countries can solve a large part of green problems.
Finally, I also think that personals can help the environment which can become better accompany by the efforts and cooperation of politicians. A good example of this is that misguided awareness could lead to environmental pollution, so if personals can improve their knowledge about the environment, they will probably help lots of stuff for governments. Therefore, these problems can address as quickly as possible owing to people would do voluntarily clean small areas and do propaganda some green protection strategies or help improve other's awareness.
For the reasons mentioned above, I totally reject that only governments have the power to solve environmental problems that are posing serious threats in today’s world, and individuals also have the task to protect their earth.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-18 | Ngoc Anh 97 | 89 | view |
| 2019-11-15 | TrucNgoc | 78 | view |
| 2019-11-15 | TrucNgoc | 56 | view |
| 2019-11-15 | TrucNgoc | 56 | view |
| 2019-10-21 | Ngoc Khanh Ong | 84 | view |
- It is now possible for scientists and tourists to travel to remote natural environment, such as South pole.Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages. 56
- the table below shows the proportion of income spent on 4 common items in the UK in 1998
- The graph and chart give information and forecast about the vehicle and CO2 emission in England and Wales between 2000 and 2020.https://www.testbig.com/sites/default/files/a_4.jpg 56
- The graph below shows US consumers' average annual expenditures on the cell phone and national and international fixed-line and services in America between 2001 and 2010 61
- The graph below shows the number of enquiries received by the Tourist Information Office in one city over a six month period in 2011.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.https://www.tes 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, finally, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, while, for example, for instance, such as, as a result, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 41.998997996 60% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1624.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 288.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.63888888889 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11953428781 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.18258668769 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.572916666667 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 487.8 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.8084906644 49.4020404114 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.333333333 106.682146367 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 20.7667163134 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.6666666667 7.06120827912 194% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.263972788602 0.244688304435 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0946211450094 0.084324248473 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0600347579097 0.0667982634062 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14154289725 0.151304729494 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.025345632741 0.056905535591 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.1 13.0946893788 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.73 12.4159519038 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.77 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.