Environmental protection is the responsibility of politicians not individuals as individuals can do too little To what extent do you agree or disagree

Essay topics:

Environmental protection is the responsibility of politicians, not individuals as individuals can do too little. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Nowadays, our planet is facing the destruction of the environment. Some people believe that it seems only governments is responsible for the natural conservation and individuals do not take responsibility in protecting environment, because this problem is too big for individuals. Personally, I completely disagree with this view.
There is a variety of reasons why both the governments and humans in the world should save our planet Earth. I would argue that individuals do not have to solve environmental problems. Firstly, human activities are the main cause of the devastation of nature. For example, people are cutting down forest- deforestation for providing wood for fuel, making land for housing, industries. This can lead to global warming by increasing the amount of carbon dioxide in the air. Therefore, individuals are responsible for their destructive activities and they should improve environment.
Secondly, when the governments introduce policies and organize public campaigns about natural conservation, the citizens should obey the laws and contribute to protect ecosystem. For instance, some countries impose “green taxes” on industries and encourage their residents use public transport rather than driving. Consequently, we decrease the environmental pollution, global warming and increase government budget.
However, I would agree that there are several serious and large environmental problems that governments are the most important role of resolving this problem. This is because our Earth are suffering a lot of natural disasters such as flooding, rising sea levels, frequent droughts and greenhouse gases. Therefore, only the countries and organizations have a huge amount of money and time for reducing and preventing natural problems, because the government has a much greater resources than an individual does.
In conclusion, it is clear to me that government must address the problem of environmental destruction, and I disagree that individuals is not responsible for saving natural environment.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-08-11 Chau Anaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaâ 78 view
2023-05-12 Spring123 61 view
2023-03-03 TLan168 73 view
2023-02-25 TLan168 56 view
2023-02-25 TLan168 11 view
Essays by user nguyenphthao99… :

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, firstly, however, second, secondly, so, therefore, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 41.998997996 52% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1742.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 301.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.78737541528 5.12529762239 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16525528304 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.2220227604 2.80592935109 115% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.58803986711 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 533.7 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.7662897326 49.4020404114 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.875 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8125 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.875 7.06120827912 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.211217164094 0.244688304435 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0731026426228 0.084324248473 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0869182398939 0.0667982634062 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136173211503 0.151304729494 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0807465094297 0.056905535591 142% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.0946893788 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.28 50.2224549098 72% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.3 12.4159519038 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.04 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.