Environmental protection is the responsibility of politicians, not individuals as individuals can do too little To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Environmental reservation has been a controversial topic over a few decades. There are many opinions that suggest this responsibility should be left to those in high positions. I completely disagree with this statement; thus this essay will be used to prove my point.
A number of people claim that it is the duty of government officials to take action against environmental pollution. This was made possible due to the fact that governments have the right to introduce environmentally-friendly bills and regulations throughout nations and enforce them widely. As an example, in many European countries, all citizens were required to move to fully electric vehicles before 2030 to replace their fossil fuel-consuming ones.
However, as a big believer in individuals’ potential, I am opposed to this claim since everyone could join hands to make changes. There may be policies introduced by politicians to make the world greener, but it is one's awareness and actions that determine whether or not these policies are implemented. In fact, it is citizens who have supremacy over politicians. The approval of the electric vehicles bill was realized because of the rising number of electric cars among Europeans.
To conclude, authority figures seem to be superior to the majority when it comes to having an impact on the environment. But the voices and actions of the crowds could not be taken for granted as the high-table would decide what would affect the global environment.
- In many nations people in huge cities either live alone or in small family units instead of in large extended family groups Is this a positive or negative trend 56
- The line graph shows the average number of weekly patients visiting four clinics of a hospital from 2010 to 2016 10
- Students leave high school without learning how to manage their money What are the reasons and solutions for this issue 56
- Environmental protection is the responsibility of politicians not individuals as individuals can do too little To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- Modern technology is changing our world It has advantages such as bringing people closer together through communication it also has disadvantages such as destroying the differences between cultures To what extent do you agree or disagree with this stateme 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 216, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...ns to make the world greener, but it is ones awareness and actions that determine wh...
^^^^
Line 5, column 258, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: whether
...es awareness and actions that determine whether or not these policies are implemented. In fact...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, may, thus, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1249.0 1615.20841683 77% => OK
No of words: 237.0 315.596192385 75% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.27004219409 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.92362132708 4.20363070211 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.24433340289 2.80592935109 116% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.658227848101 0.561755894193 117% => OK
syllable_count: 398.7 506.74238477 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.3077737742 49.4020404114 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.083333333 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.75 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.66666666667 7.06120827912 38% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.087029876836 0.244688304435 36% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0286165096305 0.084324248473 34% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0192441411437 0.0667982634062 29% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0489527481732 0.151304729494 32% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0109898098127 0.056905535591 19% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.18 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 78.4519038076 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.