Environmental protection is the responsibility of politicians, not individuals as individuals can do too little To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Environmental reservation has been a controversial topic over a few decades. Many opinions refer to this responsibility should be left to the high tables. I completely disagree with this statement; thus this essay will be used to prove my point.
A number of people claimed that it is the duty of people who govern countries to take action against worldwide pollution. This was made possible due to the fact that governments have the right to introduce environmental-friendly bills and regulations throughout nations and enforce them widely. A prime example is that in many European countries, all citizens had been forced to convert to fully electric vehicles to replace their current fossil fuel-consuming ones before 2030 via a valid bill.
However, as a big believer in individuals’ potential, I am opposed to this claim since everyone could join hands to make changes. The laws could be introduced by the politicians to make a greener world but it is one’s awareness and actions that decide whether to implement these rules or not. In fact, it is the citizens having supremacy over politicians. The approval of the electric vehicles bill was realised because of the rising number of electric cars among Europeans.
To conclude, authority figures seem to be superior to the majority when it comes to having impacts on the environment. But the voices and actions of the crowds could not be taken for granted as the high-table make decisions influencing the global environment
- The charts below show the favourite takeaways of people in Canada and the number of Indian restaurants in Canada between 1960 and 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at leas
- The table below shows the number of motor vehicles per 1 000 inhabitants in eight countries in 1990 and 2000
- The chart below gives information about the growth of urban population in certain parts of the world including the prediction of the future Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- New technologies have changed the way children spend their free time Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 61
- In many nations people in huge cities either live alone or in small family units instead of in large extended family groups Is this a positive or negative trend 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, thus, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1246.0 1615.20841683 77% => OK
No of words: 242.0 315.596192385 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.14876033058 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94415379849 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.1167107122 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.657024793388 0.561755894193 117% => OK
syllable_count: 393.3 506.74238477 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.3264456929 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.833333333 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1666666667 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.25 7.06120827912 32% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0612301125381 0.244688304435 25% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0214444366914 0.084324248473 25% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0199518055837 0.0667982634062 30% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0351887292844 0.151304729494 23% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0177203818791 0.056905535591 31% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.59 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.52 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.