Environmental protection is the responsibility of politicians, not individuals as individuals can do too little. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Many people would subscribe the view that politicians are responsible for protecting the environment. However, I am of the opinion that both governments and citizens should play their role in solving environmental problems as will be discussed
.
On the one hand, the executive branch has an important duty in solving problems related to the environment. Firstly, the government has the power to enact laws to stop individual harmful acts as well as impose financial penalties on companies over-exploiting environment. For example, developed countries like Poland and Norway introduced green-tax policy which return tax for enterprises reducing emissions and toxic waste, which encourages companies protect our living environment. Secondly, only the authorities are able to have enough funding to deal with serious environmental problems. Extreme weather events like global warming, prolonged droughts, violent storms require much efforts in term of finance from cooperation of politicians and large environmental organizations to be effectively addressed.
On the other hand, the environment can not be fully protected without the contribution of individuals. Initially, without citizens’ law-respecting and following, governmental intervention hardly works. For instance, despite the number of laws established, in Vietnam it can be seen that numerous wastes on street, lake and the gas emissions from vehicles is increasing especially in big cities. Furthermore, individuals can help in various ways namely recycling more, buying more energy-efficient household items or planting more trees in their gardens. They can also start volunteering campaigns to ask other individuals and organizations to save environment.
In conclusion, for the reasons mentioned above, I concur that protecting the environment is the obligation of both politicians and individuals.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-12-14 | Naive Dinosaur | 84 | view |
- Environmental protection is the responsibility of politicians, not individuals as individuals can do too little. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 89
- describe line graph 11
- The world natural resources are consumed at an ever-increased rate. Whatare the dangers of this situation? What should we do? 84
- Popular events like the football world cup and other international sporting occasions are essential in easing international tensions and releasing patriotic emotions in a safe way. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? 73
- Some people think that secondary or high school student should be taught money management because it is an important life skill. Do you agree or disagree with the statement? 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...nmental problems as will be discussed . On the one hand, the executive branc...
^
Line 5, column 680, Rule ID: MUCH_COUNTABLE[1]
Message: Use 'many' with countable nouns.
Suggestion: many
...longed droughts, violent storms require much efforts in term of finance from coopera...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, however, second, secondly, so, well, for example, for instance, in conclusion, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1618.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 268.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.03731343284 5.12529762239 118% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04607285448 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.40015615788 2.80592935109 121% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.664179104478 0.561755894193 118% => OK
syllable_count: 492.3 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.2634772676 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.461538462 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6153846154 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.3846153846 7.06120827912 161% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.161549296182 0.244688304435 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0564733909625 0.084324248473 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0418207599167 0.0667982634062 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0880144071172 0.151304729494 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0344751038272 0.056905535591 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.3 13.0946893788 132% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 50.2224549098 68% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.75 12.4159519038 143% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.23 8.58950901804 119% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.