Establishing good relationships in the workplace is not important, as the primary goal of every person is to focus on work. To what extent do you agree with this statement?
Nowadays a working environment is becoming more and more essential than it used to be decades or centuries ago. It is considered by some individuals that there is no significance in relationships between colleagues since the main purpose every employee is work and its results. In my opinion, relationships and focusing on work are both of the high importance. Hence, this essay will examine two points of view and underline advantages as well as disadvantages.
On the one hand, a good relationship at work makes person's job easier and faster than if they work alone. What I mean is that such connections between people lead to a situation when all individuals work together as a team in order to solve problems and achieve goals. Needless to say that such type associations makes persons less nervous and stressed since they can rely on their colleagues. For example, when I worked in Yandex, managers of this company often offered their employees team buildings. That is because this firm has a strong position and a motto. Success is always a collaborative work. The results are seen with the naked eye - Yandex is one of the most wealthiest companies in world.
On the other hand, focusing on a job help people show themselves and obtain individual success. In other words, when a person works alone, they do not rely on someone else, consequently, they are able to ensure in the final results of their work and receive rewards from a boss. What is more, if individuals act by themselves, they do not spend time on "empty" discussions as well as irrelevant topics with their colleagues. It was proved by scientists that such conversations are 30% of a working day.
To sum up, it is a controversial issue, but I am inclined to support the position that people should be focused on work since it is more productive and rewarding.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 669, Rule ID: MOST_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use only 'wealthiest' (without 'most') when you use the superlative.
Suggestion: wealthiest
...th the naked eye - Yandex is one of the most wealthiest companies in world. On the other han...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 669, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'most the wealthiest'.
Suggestion: most the wealthiest
...th the naked eye - Yandex is one of the most wealthiest companies in world. On the other han...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, hence, if, so, well, for example, i mean, as well as, in my opinion, in other words, to sum up, what is more, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1539.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 315.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.88571428571 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21286593061 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98170965272 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 176.041082164 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.580952380952 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 477.9 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.9115721784 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.1875 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6875 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.125 7.06120827912 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.216482452164 0.244688304435 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0681778254679 0.084324248473 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0389299168992 0.0667982634062 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122691068382 0.151304729494 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.037866048193 0.056905535591 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.0946893788 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.08 12.4159519038 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.44 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.