In the modern time, work life is considered to be a driving factor to good mental health. Some argue that, building good relationships in work place is irrelevant, given you complete your individual task on hand. I however, disagree with this notion, the below essay will agree upon my opinion and provide relevant examples.
To begin with, work takes away more than half of a mans life time, thereby, being unsatisfied by your work could potentially lead to mental problems. For instance, studies done on work life balance by Harverd University in the 90's show that, individual who is unsatisfied with their work, are 78% more likely to go through depression. They also found out, folks with good relationships at their work have the characteristics of success. Furthermore, they are more likely to have important corporate skills like, loyalty, team spirit, which are the foundations bounding the corporate life.
On the other hand, people who prefer working alone so not give into meaning less conversations to build relationships, instead would channel this time towards productivity. However, not every task could be done without assistance. Many of the ground breaking projects and ideas, where the results of good team spirit and coordinated efforts by many. thereby, the foundation of corporate life is coordinated efforts. For instance, Facebook a break through innovation in social media platform, was a combined effort by more than 10 people, who had to work day in and out to produce results. Facebook would not have seen the light of the day, if Mark Zakarburg though he could work alone.
To conclude, although, focusing on work yields good results, however, building good relationships at work could be advantageous for the long run.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 57, Rule ID: LIFE_TIME[1]
Message: Did you mean 'lifetime'?
Suggestion: lifetime
...ork takes away more than half of a mans life time, thereby, being unsatisfied by your wor...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 362, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...h depression. They also found out, folks with good relationships at their work ha...
^^
Line 5, column 77, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun conversations is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
... working alone so not give into meaning less conversations to build relationships, i...
^^^^
Line 5, column 351, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Thereby
...spirit and coordinated efforts by many. thereby, the foundation of corporate life is co...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, however, if, so, for instance, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1474.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 284.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.19014084507 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10515524023 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80955909302 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.612676056338 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 443.7 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.4283722778 49.4020404114 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.285714286 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2857142857 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.85714285714 7.06120827912 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.20267063573 0.244688304435 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0703535605418 0.084324248473 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0486029002883 0.0667982634062 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.139924006633 0.151304729494 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0435305271184 0.056905535591 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.63 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.