Submitted by Gauravdeep singh on Sun, 08/24/2014 - 12:32
Nowadays, due to advancement of technology, everything is changing by this. Indeed, traditional form of communication has also been revolutionized by new technology. I strongly believe that it is a positive development because it gives ample benefits to every person to live easier life.
To begin, there are several ways by which technology affecting communication between the people. Firstly, it is easier method of communication because, in bygone era, people are generally used letters, telegrams for communication with their relatives or even friends, who are living in abroad. However, these new technical gadgets such as mobile phone, computer, tablet and internet make it so easier for all citizens. Also, several business men are using this for face to face communication with their clients on internet.
Furthermore, there are also has some other positive effects. These method of communication saves a lot of time because traditional methods like letters take several days to reach on its destination but by this technology, we can talk to our relatives with a couple of time on mobile phone. In addition, people are often wants to send their secret data to other folks especially in army. Thus, it saves people personal or privacy data. Last but not least, these types of communication bring people relations closer to each other.
All in all it is concluded that, technology affected many ways people interact with each other in past. However, this technology is very easy way to communicate with citizens because it saves time as well as personal data. Thus, it is a good method to bring more happiness in the citizens.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 62, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this method' or 'These methods'?
Suggestion: This method; These methods
...e also has some other positive effects. These method of communication saves a lot of time be...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 96, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the past'?
Suggestion: in the past
...ny ways people interact with each other in past. However, this technology is very easy ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, so, thus, well, in addition, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1430.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 273.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.2380952381 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06481385082 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92792638973 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.589743589744 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 467.1 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.0460638926 49.4020404114 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.3333333333 106.682146367 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.73333333333 7.06120827912 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.278770672458 0.244688304435 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0932517843604 0.084324248473 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0793834126254 0.0667982634062 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.139426948032 0.151304729494 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.101893869992 0.056905535591 179% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.0946893788 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.29 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 78.4519038076 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.