Explain some of the way in which humans are damaging the enviroment.
What can governments do to adress these problems. What can individual do.
In developing process, the way humans deliberate or accidentally impair the environment varies. In order to mitigate these issues, there is a need for greater effort from the government and individuals simultaneously.
On the one hand, there are a vast variety of how human activities are responsible to environment contamination. Firstly, in the context of expansion of urban areas, air quality is severely degraded. It is proven that exhaust emission from personal vehicles and factories is the primary factor contributing to alarming air pollution. Secondly, water source is also damaged by human activities. It is evident that irresponsible disposal of water to water is directly killing aquatic lives and impairing the waterworks. For instance, a serious oil spillage near Caribbean coastal areas put the life of thousands of birds in jeopardy.
On the other hand, there are several remedies to address these problems. From government scale, there is a need for imposing greater tax on personal transports and petroleum industry. As a result, this will discourage people from using personal vehicles, leading to reduction of emission from these transport. Also, in order to dictate illicit disposal, there is a ground for authorities to impose more restrictive constrain on industry. For individual scale, rather than using personal vehicles such as automobiles or motorbikes, they should opt for public transport. Moreover, people should engage in campaigns aiming at raising public awareness about these worrying problems.
It goes without saying that there are a number of ways which human have contaminated the environment, urging government and individuals to adopt for several long-term solutions to deal with this effectively.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, for instance, such as, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1483.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 265.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.59622641509 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03470204552 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04405530418 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.6 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 471.6 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.3140148474 49.4020404114 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.8666666667 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6666666667 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.73333333333 7.06120827912 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.125547985209 0.244688304435 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0425943064351 0.084324248473 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0401351026896 0.0667982634062 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.088184695032 0.151304729494 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0370720213653 0.056905535591 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.3 50.2224549098 74% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.9 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.2 8.58950901804 119% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.