Face-to-face communication is better than other types of communication, such as letters, email, or telephone calls. Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
In the era of urbanization, the advent of technological advances has brought a surge in electrical contacts via letters, emails, and telephones. However, people are giving more value to in-person conversations as they prove to be more advantageous. I approve of the view and this essay will examine the perks of it.
Firstly, first-hand communications accommodate physical interactions that tighten the bond between people. During talks, there are times when gestures and actions emerge as better communicators than words. To be more specific, whenever a person experiences a spiral of lasting desperation, the solution comes down to a good listener who is by his side and provides a shoulder to lean on.
Secondly, direct speech has proven to be an explicit avenue of delivering messages. The information desired to be distributed can be problematic and opaque at some point. On such occasions, on-scene explanations foster much in-depth understanding of the given contexts since sudden interruptions in the process of delivering information allow the speakers to recognize the head-aching parts and thus abate the misconceptions.
Last but not least, in-person communication facilitates hanging-out opportunities. It is not always for serious and practical issues to have conversations with others. Instead, people go for direct meetings to alleviate the feeling of isolation and being out of the loop. Moreover, conversations with those you adore are without fail considered as memorable experiences and quality time.
In conclusion, it is totally palatable and justifiable that first-hand connections are being put more stress on given the reasons listed above.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-01-20 | haikhoa0914 | 61 | view |
- Traffic and housing problems could be solved by moving large companies factories and their employees to the countryside Do you agree or disagree 84
- Face to face communication is better than other types of communication such as letters email or telephone calls Do you agree or disagree with the following statement 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, thus, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1417.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 253.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.60079051383 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98822939669 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.32676267622 2.80592935109 119% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.683794466403 0.561755894193 122% => OK
syllable_count: 446.4 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.9380978397 49.4020404114 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.214285714 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0714285714 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.07142857143 7.06120827912 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0838187051985 0.244688304435 34% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0290137281845 0.084324248473 34% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0420524697472 0.0667982634062 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0393241981945 0.151304729494 26% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0432938744514 0.056905535591 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.28 50.2224549098 72% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.9 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.15 8.58950901804 118% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.