Failure is a proof that the desire wasn t strong enough To what extent do you agree

Essay topics:

Failure is a proof that the desire wasn’t strong enough. To what extent do you agree?

Failure is a proof that the desire wasn’t strong enough. To what extent do you agree?
Failure is a stable part to succeed, but most of us don’t like this experience. Tons of questions were given on this topic, if failure is a proof that the desire wasn’t strong enough or not. I partially agree with this statement, that failure is based most on little effort. Indeed, failure is affected by more criterions, both from external effects and by ourselves.

At the first point, people fail to achieve their success because they don’t work hard enough. Many people wish they could have tons of things and they make a large number of targets; however, they just put little effort on those targets and never achieve them. The most common reason why they can’t succeed is they don’t know the dignity of purposes and just want everything came true without spending lots of effort. I’ve seen many people surround me have so many wishes and targets to fulfill in short-term but the majority can’t finish their aims. When people can’t see the forceful reason that will push them self and do it, they can’t do anything. To illustrate, if you want a kid to study harder and receive higher score in class, you have to show that kid the dignity of studying and the kid must successfully answer a question: “Why I have to do that?”. If people can answer that question, they will able to reach to their aims and decrease failures.

On the other hand, I also believe that a person who really desires something can also fail. In facts, failure is a stable part in our lives to reach to success and we are not purely perfect to accomplish something in the first attempt. When we make a target-plan, most of us will fail in several times during that process. It is not because we didn’t try hard and put efforts on it, it’s just that we didn’t have enough knowledge, thinking patterns, and experience. We are human and we have permission to fail. Even Thomas Edison, a famous scientist who created electric light, were also fail thousands of time until he successfully made the first electric light on the world. If we fail but we don’t give up our targets, and we continue expand our knowledge, one day we can succeed.

In conclusion, failure is based on many effected criterions, it is not only a proof that we didn’t try hard enough, but also a reality that we didn’t have enough experience. If we never give up our desire, we can do anything we want.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-08-11 annaalysia007 73 view
2023-08-11 annaalysia007 61 view
2023-08-11 annaalysia007 56 view
Essays by user annaalysia007 :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 157, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...could have tons of things and they make a large number of targets; however, they just put little ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 589, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'failed'.
Suggestion: failed
...t who created electric light, were also fail thousands of time until he successfully...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, really, so, in conclusion, in fact, in short, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 10.4138276553 182% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 7.30460921844 219% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 65.0 24.0651302605 270% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2045.0 1615.20841683 127% => OK
No of words: 438.0 315.596192385 139% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.66894977169 5.12529762239 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.57476223824 4.20363070211 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.41561682505 2.80592935109 86% => OK
Unique words: 210.0 176.041082164 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.479452054795 0.561755894193 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 606.6 506.74238477 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 5.43587174349 239% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 2.10420841683 333% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 16.0721442886 137% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.9271116747 49.4020404114 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.9545454545 106.682146367 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9090909091 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.27272727273 7.06120827912 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.236208628583 0.244688304435 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0998431063436 0.084324248473 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.168552274341 0.0667982634062 252% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.292164635602 0.151304729494 193% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.362273600929 0.056905535591 637% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 13.0946893788 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 50.2224549098 138% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 11.3001002004 73% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.81 12.4159519038 79% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.32 8.58950901804 85% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.0 9.78957915832 51% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.