With the fast pace of modern life more and more people are turning towards fast food for their main meals.
Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages?
Nowadays, fast food industries are growing like mushroom after the rain. Given the fact that today’s generation is always busy, so they consider fast food as the best choice. In my perspective, this trend brings pros and cons. I believe that it is outweighed by the negative effects.
Firstly, most fast food contains a lot of calories, salt and artificial substances which cause many dangerous illness such as obesity, high cholesterol, … Example: scientists in Singapore studied that people who eat fast food have a risk of getting diabetes over 27% than those who don’t.
Second, another reason is that fast food being harmful to the environment. Consuming fast food contribute a plenty of waste. For instance, most of producers usually use boxes that are made by paper or plastic bag and thus harm the environment. For instance, Fast food restaurants and distributors use a lot of packaging. Wrappers, straws, boxes, bags and other fast food packaging count for approximately 40% of all litter with Styrofoam (which takes 900 years to breakdown) being the most common waste.
In conclusion, with the reasons aforementioned above, I think that fast food is a terrible danger for both humanity and nature.
- The diagram below shows the process of recycling glass bottles 73
- The world of work is rapidly changing and employees cannot depend on having the same job or the same working conditions for life Why is it the case Can you suggest some ways to prepare people to work in the future 95
- The table and graph below give information about cinema attendance in Australia between 1994 and 2002 62
- In some parts of the world it is increasingly popular to research the history of one s own family Why do people want to do this Is it a positive or negative development 84
- Waste disposal in one European country 2005 2008 59
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 140, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'most of', you should use 'the' ('most of the producers') or simply say ''most producers''.
Suggestion: most of the producers; most producers
...ribute a plenty of waste. For instance, most of producers usually use boxes that are made by pape...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, second, so, thus, for instance, i think, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 7.85571142285 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 19.0 41.998997996 45% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1023.0 1615.20841683 63% => OK
No of words: 198.0 315.596192385 63% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.16666666667 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75116612262 4.20363070211 89% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79137626465 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 132.0 176.041082164 75% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.666666666667 0.561755894193 119% => OK
syllable_count: 299.7 506.74238477 59% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 69.0368209337 49.4020404114 140% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.0 106.682146367 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 7.06120827912 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 8.67935871743 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.254401836943 0.244688304435 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101150522714 0.084324248473 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0531498872101 0.0667982634062 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.154974681705 0.151304729494 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.031986100296 0.056905535591 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.0946893788 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 50.2224549098 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.41 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.76 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 78.4519038076 68% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.