The table below shows daily oil production in 4 countries from 2000 to 2004.
The table compares four different nations, namely Nigeria, Chad, Congo and Somalia, in terms of oil manufactured each day between 2000 and 2004.
Looking at the graph, it is immediately obvious that while the amount of petroleum made per day in Congo decreased, the opposite was true for the other countries.
In 2000, Congo was the leading area in fuel produced daily with 275,000 barrels, in the second place was Nigeria with 205,000 bin. Meanwhile, the figures for the rest of the territories was insignificant, 5000 casks for Somalia and 0 containers for Chad.
Over the four years ensuing, a downward trend happened in Congo, with the reduction of 72,000 containers, whilst the reverse was correct for Somalia, with a tenfold increase compared to the original, at 50,000 barrels and this number also was the quantity of oil production in Chad in 2004. By contrast, the data for Nigeria experienced a fluctuation, falling to 190,000 bin in 2002 before rising to 213,000 casks in 2004.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-12-05 | Trần Ánh Vy | 67 | view |
| 2024-11-30 | Trần Ánh Vy | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-26 | Trần Ánh Vy | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-26 | Trần Ánh Vy | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-26 | Trần Ánh Vy | view |
- The percentage of female members of parliament in European countries 2000 2012 92
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010. 67
- The graph shows estimated oil production capacity for several Gulf countries between 1990 and 2010. 78
- The bar chart shows the number of cars per 1000 people in 5 European countries in 3 years compared with the European average 73
- The chart shows the proportion of renewable energy in total energy supply in 4 countries from 1997 to 2010 86
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, look, second, so, while, in the second place
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 827.0 965.302439024 86% => OK
No of words: 165.0 196.424390244 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.01212121212 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.58402463422 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67185445791 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.642424242424 0.547539520022 117% => OK
syllable_count: 231.3 283.868780488 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 58.0277711292 43.030603864 135% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.833333333 112.824112599 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.5 22.9334400587 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 5.23603664747 172% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.116325479564 0.215688989381 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0608208197193 0.103423049105 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0608504012365 0.0843802449381 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0772643018348 0.15604864568 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0653903941353 0.0819641961636 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.2329268293 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.99 61.2550243902 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.28 8.06136585366 115% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.