With a fast pace of modern life more and more people are turning towards fast food for their main meals.Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages?

The growing economy levels have changed the eating habits of modern society. A dichotomy appears in opinions on whether the introduction of fast-food restaurants has more benefits or drawbacks. The quickly prepared meals, from my viewpoint, possess some advantages, however, there is an abundance of disadvantages.

First and foremost, fast food does have a number of advantages, one of them being the time conservation. When preparing a meal at home one needs a plethora of time for groundwork, which includes researching the recipe and purchasing fresh ingredients, whereas, processed foods from restaurants could be taken in less than ten minutes. For instance, many chain restaurants provide drive-throughs, where the order can be placed and received by only opening the car window.

On the other hand, a myriad of drawbacks is held by fast-food. Food fried in oil rarely contains all the nutrients needed for the body. Therefore, malnutrition occurs resulting in a poor immune system. Furthermore, high-level fast food consumption also damages one's health. Obesity and heart stroke are only a few of the most frequent conditions caused by convenience food. To illustrate, junk food contains a large amount of cholesterol, which clogs the blood vessels, resulting in irreversible heart damage.

In conclusion, the development of fast-paced rhythm in society has changed the way people perceive their nutrition. I believe, that the disadvantages of convenience food counterbalance the advantages. If humankind will continue consuming junk food, they will suffer from negative consequences to health.

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 262, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...evel fast food consumption also damages ones health. Obesity and heart stroke are on...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, furthermore, however, if, so, therefore, whereas, for instance, in conclusion, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 6.0 24.0651302605 25% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1368.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 244.0 315.596192385 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.60655737705 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.95227774224 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.18693331273 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.696721311475 0.561755894193 124% => OK
syllable_count: 410.4 506.74238477 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.5276311779 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.2 106.682146367 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.2666666667 20.7667163134 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.26666666667 7.06120827912 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.216099250082 0.244688304435 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0688708756228 0.084324248473 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0534186290728 0.0667982634062 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124199238374 0.151304729494 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0312919207518 0.056905535591 55% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.0946893788 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 50.2224549098 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.96 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.12 8.58950901804 118% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.