Preferably in the future scenario, education is more significant for human beings lives. However, some educator is doing study in school and universities in the subject of computer-based, rather than science subject. I will explain the pros and cons of the reason in the upcoming paragraphs.
Commencing with the most salient reason for considering this negative development in world for children. The cardinal point to consider is that, although the trend of computer has more worthwhile in the existing time for pupils life, yet we cannot ignore the awful effects of this trend. Since nowadays it is shown the majority of children avoid hard practice in their studies. In fact of despite children keen on computer technology-based study. Ergo, the technology development more drawbacks create for student education.
Furthermore, the sole number of viewpoint, why consider cons development. The provide factor behind it is clear the science subject enormous crucial in day to day lives. While nowadays the bad influence by now development of the computer owing to the majority of student prefer to study on the computer and they are forgotten to the value of science subject in the living field. Because not only the more need of science education than another subject but also the enormous worthwhile their economy. The more education the excieve opportunity in life. Ergo, if a student learns studies about science, they can achieve many jobs vacancy in world.
To conclude, I pen down saying that science education tremendously necessary for everyone. In my perspective that, the authority and parents ought to that said about the importance of life.
- The table below gives information about the underground railway systems in six cities Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- The charts give information about world forest in six different regions
- Governments in many countries have recently introduced special taxes on foods and beverages with high levels of sugar Some think these taxes are a good idea while others disagree Discuss both views and give your opinion 78
- The bar chart shows the percentage of the total world population in four countries in 1950 and 2002 and projections for 2050
- The graphs below show the percentage of household energy used and the amount of greenhouse gases produced in Australia Summarise the information making comparisons where relevant
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 289, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Since” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ignore the awful effects of this trend. Since nowadays it is shown the majority of ch...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 75, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...ewpoint, why consider cons development. The provide factor behind it is clear the science s...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 624, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'jobs'' or 'job's'?
Suggestion: jobs'; job's
...es about science, they can achieve many jobs vacancy in world. To conclude, I pen...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, so, while, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1400.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 265.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.28301886792 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03470204552 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83909541899 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.581132075472 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 440.1 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.7251789644 49.4020404114 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.5 106.682146367 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.5625 20.7667163134 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.4375 7.06120827912 49% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.343237023616 0.244688304435 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0930696646316 0.084324248473 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0755032152196 0.0667982634062 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.177509967484 0.151304729494 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0771627057464 0.056905535591 136% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 50.2224549098 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.42 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 78.4519038076 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.