Nowadays, it is a fact that fewer youngsters engaging in agricultural work. There are several reasons involved in this decline and why young people should be received the government’s encouragement.
There are two of the primary causes associated with this problem are as follows. Firstly, youngsters have kept a negative perception of farming work over the past decades. The agricultural sector, in their perspective, brings less economic prosperity and vocational opportunities. This is because farmers have to take care of crops regularly and even face failure due to the risk of external elements such as diseases or weather conditions. Secondly, the young tend to find other jobs which meet their standards. Because of the happening modernization and globalization, more of employers and companies entail people of qualifications and set skills related to popular sectors such as Artificial Intelligence or Business Administration instead of farming ones. Youngsters, thus, would earn handsome salaries and live a financially comfortable life by which engaging in these jobs.
However, the government needs to motivate young residents to involve in farming works. First, this generation is promising to develop agriculture in the foreseeing future. This is because they are more advantageous than the one in the past with the similarity of technology and high level of education. These modern farmers, for instance, can apply the latest inventions and their gained knowledge into their nation’s agriculture properly. Second, the participation of youngsters could sustain the manpower of this sector. If young generations continuously stay uninvolved, there will be a disappearance in the next generation who inherit the nation’s agriculture.
To conclude, several causes are resulting in the decrease in agriculture workers while I do believe that youngsters should be encouraged to engage in farming work.
- The chart below shows a comparison of different kinds of energy production in a European country in 1995 and 2005 84
- FEWER YOUNG PEOPLE DO FARMING WORK IN RURAL AREAS WHY SHOULD YOUNG PEOPLE ENCOURAGED TO DO FARMING WORK 84
- The table below gives information on consumer spending on different items in five different countries in 2002 78
- Research indicates that the characteristics we are born with have much more influence on our personality and development than any experiences we may have in our life Which do you consider to be the major influence 91
- Nowadays more people are choosing to socialize online rather than face to face is this a positive or negative development 84
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 111, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...n farming works. First, this generation is promising to develop agriculture in the foreseein...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, thus, while, for instance, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1639.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 288.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.69097222222 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11953428781 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.2197199785 2.80592935109 115% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.621527777778 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 513.0 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.3053590861 49.4020404114 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.4375 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.3125 7.06120827912 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.240916392767 0.244688304435 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0668867141834 0.084324248473 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0794749190902 0.0667982634062 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.170762127099 0.151304729494 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.080580078464 0.056905535591 142% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.28 50.2224549098 72% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.43 12.4159519038 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.85 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 78.4519038076 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 111, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...n farming works. First, this generation is promising to develop agriculture in the foreseein...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, thus, while, for instance, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1639.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 288.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.69097222222 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11953428781 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.2197199785 2.80592935109 115% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.621527777778 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 513.0 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.3053590861 49.4020404114 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.4375 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.3125 7.06120827912 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.240916392767 0.244688304435 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0668867141834 0.084324248473 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0794749190902 0.0667982634062 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.170762127099 0.151304729494 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.080580078464 0.056905535591 142% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.28 50.2224549098 72% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.43 12.4159519038 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.85 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 78.4519038076 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.