fhdfg
Majority of parents consider light reading as a wasteful activity. They claim that their off springs should only read books dedicated to academic education. In my opinion, youngsters should read both types of books, and I will list some reasons why they should do this in the paragraphs below.
To begin with, reading books for entertainment develops creativity in children. While reading any story or narrative, children imagine all actions that are written in a subject of a book and therefore, they improve their abilities to think creatively. In some scientific researches, for example, those read light books scored more in creativity tests than those who do not. That is why, I believe that teens can make a benefit from reading such books.
Turning to the other side of the argument, serious books such as scientific ones can be beneficial in educational terms. This is because they broaden horizons of young adults and influence positively their way of thinking. What is more, these writings may also help to enhance vocabulary and grammatical accuracy, for children will try to repeat words or phrases written in the book. Many academics strongly suggest to read as many books as possible if somebody aims to become well-educated.
To conclude, both light and educational books play a pivotal role for children. While the former improves creative thinking, the latter increases literacy. From my point of view, whatever children read, it is still helpful for them.
- The graph below compares the number of visits to two new music sites on the web.Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below. 73
- Some people believe that studying at university or college is the bestroute to a successful career, while others believe that it is better toget a job straight after school.Discuss both views and give your opinion. 61
- some people consider price as most important thing to think about when buying product or service. Do you agree or disagree? 56
- Some people believe that the government should not spend money on international aid when they have their own disadvantaged people like homeless and unemployed. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 84
- Explain some of the ways in which humans are damaging theenvironment. What can governments do to address these problems?What can individual people do? 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hould do this in the paragraphs below. To begin with, reading books for enterta...
^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ke a benefit from reading such books. Turning to the other side of the argumen...
^^^
Line 3, column 412, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'suggest reading'.
Suggestion: suggest reading
...en in the book. Many academics strongly suggest to read as many books as possible if somebody a...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...somebody aims to become well-educated. To conclude, both light and educational ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, may, so, still, therefore, well, while, for example, such as, in my opinion, to begin with, what is more
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1237.0 1615.20841683 77% => OK
No of words: 240.0 315.596192385 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.15416666667 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.93597934253 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69798986387 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.633333333333 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 379.8 506.74238477 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.1657854731 49.4020404114 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.3571428571 106.682146367 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.1428571429 20.7667163134 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.14285714286 7.06120827912 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.244688304435 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.084324248473 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0667982634062 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.151304729494 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.056905535591 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.0946893788 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.29 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.69 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 78.4519038076 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.