Financial education should be a mandatory component of the school program. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
In many countries the discussion about the rising financial problems of young people has been getting more emphasis. Tough some people are voting to integrate financial education as a schooling subject.
The key problem for many young people is that they don’t know how to use and spend money in the right way. The “get what you want mentality” is widely advertised by the mass media and it looks like some people think that living with interest fees is normal. Though financial problems in young life are very common with the result that it is difficult to learn how to spend money appropriated. The main idea of teaching a financial subject must be to explain about a balanced budget and that debt could ruins one’s future.
But this is just one side that has to be considered. For me, the main question is why the parents cannot give the right advice to their kids? To leave such a personal subject in the hands of government and school means to ignore a key task of any parent: to be a good role model.
Moreover it should be considerate that the social effects of talking about money and finance in a socially diverse school class can be harmful for some students. In my opinion it is more important to teach parents about their responsibilities as a role model and have them educate the children about this private topic in a safe and private environment.
All in all I think the main task of public institutions should be to educate about common subjects and not to give such personal advice like the use of money.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-09 | Nowshin Tabassum | 73 | view |
| 2023-09-09 | Nowshin Tabassum | 73 | view |
- Some parents believe that children in their leisure time should be involved in educational activities While others believe it adds to much pressure on children Discuss both views and give your opinion 78
- Some people believe that competitive sports both team and individual have no place in the school curriculum How far do you agree or disagree 67
- The charts below show the levels of participation in education and science in developing and industrialised countries in 1980 and 1990 67
- The maps below show the changes that have taken place at the seaside resort of Templeton between 1990 and 2005 61
- The chart below shows the different levels of post school qualifications in Australia and the proportion of men and women who held them in 1999 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 259, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Though” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...at living with interest fees is normal. Though financial problems in young life are ve...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 503, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'could' requires the base form of the verb: 'ruin'
Suggestion: ruin
...t a balanced budget and that debt could ruins one’s future. But this is just one s...
^^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Moreover,
...f any parent: to be a good role model. Moreover it should be considerate that the socia...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, look, moreover, so, as to, i think, talking about, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1268.0 1615.20841683 79% => OK
No of words: 272.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.66176470588 5.12529762239 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06108636974 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49903744446 2.80592935109 89% => OK
Unique words: 147.0 176.041082164 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.540441176471 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 394.2 506.74238477 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 5.43587174349 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.0626346728 49.4020404114 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.666666667 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6666666667 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.08333333333 7.06120827912 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.182619612909 0.244688304435 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0687380872946 0.084324248473 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0415946138013 0.0667982634062 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0994807062128 0.151304729494 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0117046309378 0.056905535591 21% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.0946893788 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 50.2224549098 132% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.04 12.4159519038 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.86 8.58950901804 92% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 78.4519038076 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.