Some people believe that competitive sports both team and individual have no place in the school curriculum How far do you agree or disagree

Essay topics:

Some people believe that competitive sports, both team and individual, have no place in the school curriculum. How far do you agree or disagree?

I personally somewhat disagree with the idea that competitive sports have no place in the school curriculum.

Because there is a fact that competitive sports can improve some skills such as motor skills and social skills. These sports have not only physical benefits but also emotional and personal benefits. For example, self-confidence, sportsmanship, better vision, a healthy weight. Thus I think competitive sports are very important for children’s development.

Team sports can help kids learn important life lessons about teamwork and fair play. Team sports can improve better friendships, and help them to socialise. Likewise, individual competitive sports allows for independence and can be a great fit for a kid who doesn't like to rely on someone else's skills to perform well.

Nevertheless, I somewhat can understand the point of view that supports the idea of competitive sport should not be in the school curriculum. The reason might be that competitive sports require a lot of training, practise and dedication. So if there are not plenty of equipments, and the possibility to train kids in a dedicated way of practising then I assume that there will not be any obvious results in a good way that we can show as a proof. If so, kids can play competitive sports outside school hours. Moreover, these sports have a bit of disadvantage such as building pressure due to win, risk of injuries and developing poor attitude. Even so, I have a belief that competitive sports should be at least in the elementary and middle schools in order to improve kid's skills at a young age.

In conclusion, competitive sports have so many benefits on kids, so they have a important place in the school curriculum although they have some disadvantages.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2022-03-25 thuylinh1205 78 view
2022-03-25 thuylinh1205 78 view
2021-08-29 lili__nhnh 73 view
2020-10-22 81206Ecema 73 view
2020-10-22 81206Ecema 67 view
Essays by user 81206Ecema :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 278, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...nship, better vision, a healthy weight. Thus I think competitive sports are very imp...
^^^^
Line 5, column 259, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...ce and can be a great fit for a kid who doesnt like to rely on someone elses skills to...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 315, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a dedicated way" with adverb for "dedicated"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...ents, and the possibility to train kids in a dedicated way of practising then I assume that there ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 79, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
... so many benefits on kids, so they have a important place in the school curriculu...
^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, likewise, moreover, nevertheless, so, then, thus, well, at least, even so, for example, i think, in conclusion, such as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1471.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 288.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.10763888889 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11953428781 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00821718959 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.534722222222 0.561755894193 95% => OK
syllable_count: 452.7 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.7385157642 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.0666666667 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.93333333333 7.06120827912 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.281552304515 0.244688304435 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108509543661 0.084324248473 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0888441784029 0.0667982634062 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.201849612101 0.151304729494 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0944271706572 0.056905535591 166% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.0946893788 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.59 8.58950901804 88% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 78.4519038076 70% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.