Integrating financial lessons in high school program can become a perfect approach to prepare the future leaders with proper financial knowledge. I completely agree that starting such schooling at very early stage of any child will not only help him become aware of costs, but also promote personal savings.
Introducing economics to the school-going children provides them information on money and revenue as well as cost. As a result, they become aware of how income is incurred as well as how expenses are made. Moreover, they come to know about the impact on each and every financial transaction on their life. Such knowledge capacitates them to work on personal budgeting, enabling them to plan their expenses according the expected income before they occur. Gaining control over money through budgeting expertise allows the students to work on bigger events in future.
Similarly, compulsory financial lessons enable the young learners to control costs, resulting in great-many benefits. Academic sessions provide them the basic on how to control costs. Later, they apply the methods on their practical life and control costs on the events that occur. Such initiatives provide them with practical experience on how to apply cost-controlling techniques. Furthermore, cutting-down cost creates personal savings for the youngsters. So the teenagers learn to practice personal savings from early stage of their life. Cost-control as well as personal savings are two exclusive advantages which will keep providing benefits for their entire life.
To conclude, including financial education at very early stage of education curriculum increases the capacity of the learners to better equipped with financial knowledge for future. As such knowledge has become a mandatory part of life for adults, this is better to introduce the lessons at early stage of life to make further lessons understandable to everyone.
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 557, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...s the students to work on bigger events in future. Similarly, compulsory financial le...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, moreover, similarly, so, well, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 13.1623246493 30% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1627.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 295.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.51525423729 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14434120667 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83168756524 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 176.041082164 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.549152542373 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 511.2 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.6815873339 49.4020404114 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.6875 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4375 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.125 7.06120827912 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.090042217354 0.244688304435 37% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0298442330129 0.084324248473 35% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0441794409053 0.0667982634062 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0684698250848 0.151304729494 45% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0510725925876 0.056905535591 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.74 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.13 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 557, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...s the students to work on bigger events in future. Similarly, compulsory financial le...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, moreover, similarly, so, well, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 13.1623246493 30% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1627.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 295.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.51525423729 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14434120667 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83168756524 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 176.041082164 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.549152542373 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 511.2 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.6815873339 49.4020404114 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.6875 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4375 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.125 7.06120827912 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.090042217354 0.244688304435 37% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0298442330129 0.084324248473 35% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0441794409053 0.0667982634062 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0684698250848 0.151304729494 45% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0510725925876 0.056905535591 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.74 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.13 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.