The first car appeared on British roads in 1888. By the year 2000 there may be as many as 29 million vehicles on British roads. Alternative forms of transport should be encouraged and international laws introduced to control car ownership and use. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your knowledge or experience.
The number of cars on roads has been increased substentially, on the British roads, by the year 2000. Some people opine that to control the number of cars, people should be encouraged to use other modes of transportation, along with it some international laws should be enforced to control the car ownership. I completely agree with the given notion, as I believe that these methods would definitely prove beneficial in reducing the number of cars.
To commence with, people should be motivated to commute by using public transports. Government should trasnsform the public transportation services, to make it preferable mode of transport. For example, appropriate bus services should be available in the remote areas also. Moreover, government should make it affordable and luxurious to travel by bus then, be impoverished or afluent every people will prefer to travel by bus. Not only this, but also government should aware people about benefits of using bicycle to travel for shorter distance. Hence, encouraging people to use public transportation would play a vital role in reducing the number of cars.
Along with it, government should impose some stringent rule for owning a car. Since, it is easy for people to buy a car nowadays it is contributing in increase its number on roads, therefore laws could help in controlling the number of car a family could buy. For instance, there is a law in India that inforced by government in 2010 that a family can own only one car, which significantly resulted in reduction of cars on Indian roads. Moreover, authorities can also fix an appropriate age for a person to own and ride a car. This will stop people from buying personal cars for every family member, and consequently the number of cars running on roads would be decrease.
To sum up, introduction of laws and encouraging people to use other modes of transportation would undoubtedly prove beneficent in reducing the number of cars.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-01-07 | JOE Chen | 73 | view |
| 2023-07-05 | Selena17_ | 73 | view |
| 2021-09-21 | muhammad Hamza | 73 | view |
| 2021-08-10 | ivantran | 78 | view |
| 2021-01-11 | MinatureNomad | 66 | view |
- Some people claim that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their waste 89
- The chart show information about the number of kilometers traveled in an average month and the distribution of vehicle types in Britain 73
- The chart show information about the kilometers traveled in an average month and distribution of vehicle types in Britain 73
- the line graph shows subscription of 3G mobile service among males and females in a city in USA from 2003 to 2011 80
- Many people join distance learning programmes study material post TV Internet and study at home but some people think that it cannot bring the same benefit as attending colleges or universities does Do you agree or disagree 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 269, Rule ID: ALSO_SENT_END[1]
Message: 'Also' is not used at the end of the sentence. Use 'as well' instead.
Suggestion: as well
...should be available in the remote areas also. Moreover, government should make it af...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, hence, if, moreover, so, then, therefore, for example, for instance, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 7.85571142285 229% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1628.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 322.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05590062112 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23607819155 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94456452546 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.506211180124 0.561755894193 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 510.3 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.1172596177 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.533333333 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4666666667 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.86666666667 7.06120827912 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.268116878551 0.244688304435 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102234217116 0.084324248473 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0716959062655 0.0667982634062 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.169608198653 0.151304729494 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0763180779196 0.056905535591 134% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.0946893788 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.21 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.