Scientists often visit other planets to explore the chances of lives. Some people opine that it is a waste of enormous funds whilst others have a contrast viewpoint. Although ordinary people's lives stay the same, I believe these visits can be beneficial for mankind in the future.
On the one side, walking on the moon and other planets require huge investments. Millions of dollars are spent on rockets and other equipment to send a scientist. Further, it is unsure that they will invent and find something useful; nevertheless, billions of people are dying of starvation. Some scientists even die on their way too. For instance, Kalpana Chawla an Indian scientist died while returning from another planet. If this money is spent for the welfare of society, it will more beneficial. Therefore, instead of spending much on these journeys, more focus should be on alleviating situations of poverty-stricken people.
On the other side, the population is rapidly burgeoning on earth, finding the possibilities of life on other planets is vital. If scientists do not visit other planets, how this will be found. It is irrefutable to state that these may have little or no effects on common civilians' lives in the present but definitely affect in future. This may be possible that there will be no space to live on earth. In such a case, the moon and other planets can be the last resort for humans. For example, as per the recent article in an English newspaper, if the population increases at the same rate, in the next decades, the earth will not be a suitable planet to live on. Hence, walking on the other planets is paramount.
In conclusion, visit the moon is not a redundant activity as this is for the better future of mankind. Though funds are used, I believe such visits should be continued to invent wonders.
- Your child is going on a three day school trip to another country The head teacher wants to find parents to go with the group and you would like to go Write a letter to the head teacher In your letter say why you would like to go on the trip suggest what 73
- Sugar consumption is too harmful Some say it is governments responsibility to limit sugar intake while others sat it s individual who are responsible Discuss both views and give your own opinion 56
- It is observed that shopping on the internet is increasing in its popularity Why is it so Is it a good or bad development 67
- Labour saving devices such as dishwashers and communication tools such as computers are supposed to make our lives easier However some people argue that these devices only make them more difficult Does modern technology reduce or increase stress Give reas 67
- You went to your friend house and had meal Write a letter to your friend thanking him and his family for the meal Tell you enjoyed about the meal Thanks to his parents and what you think about them Suggest arrangements for his invite at your place 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 164, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... whilst others have a contrast viewpoint Although ordinary peoples lives stay the...
^^
Line 1, column 278, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... be beneficial for mankind in the future On the one side walking on the moon and ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 616, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ing situations of povertystricken people On the other side the population is rapi...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 697, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...alking on the other planets is paramount In conclusion visit the moon is not a re...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, if, may, nevertheless, so, therefore, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1474.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 311.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.73954983923 5.12529762239 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19942759058 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56816380074 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.514469453376 0.561755894193 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 474.3 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 5.43587174349 0% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 1.0 16.0721442886 6% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 311.0 20.2975951904 1532% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 0.0 49.4020404114 0% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 1474.0 106.682146367 1382% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 311.0 20.7667163134 1498% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 97.0 7.06120827912 1374% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 8.67935871743 12% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.134046349707 0.244688304435 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.134046349707 0.084324248473 159% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0667982634062 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0937645929267 0.151304729494 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0201975041646 0.056905535591 35% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 156.4 13.0946893788 1194% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -235.73 50.2224549098 -469% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 0.0 7.44779559118 0% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 123.4 11.3001002004 1092% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 11.69 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 22.62 8.58950901804 263% => Dale chall readability score is high.
difficult_words: 70.0 78.4519038076 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 54.0 9.78957915832 552% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 126.4 10.1190380762 1249% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 23.0 10.7795591182 213% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.