The first man to walk on the moon claimed it was a step forward for mankind However it has made little difference in most people s lives

Over the past few decades, space explorations have provided a wealth of knowledge which in turn aided many areas of science and technology. Plus, in my view, I firmly concur with this notion as there are tremendous technological breakthroughs that have been improving the quality of life on our planet.

On the one side, there are two benefits which have improved the quality of lifestyle of humans on Earth due to the space explorations programs on the moon and the other planets. To commence, one of the clearest contributions of physical exploration on the moon is the technological advancement of aviation travel. In the past, pilots used manual flight controls while controlling an aircraft. But, Because of the space programs, mechanical, computer, and electronic engineers were able to build autopilot systems with the help of computers by creating auto-flying software programs. Secondly, the contribution of engineers has resulted in the positive outcome of technological innovations, especially in the field of communication devices. For instance, Bluetooth was mainly invented for astronauts to communicate with each other through microphone walkie-talkie devices. However, later on, it was used for passing documents from one electronic device to another by humans.

Furthermore, the successful launching of GEO satellites from Earth has resulted in better predictions of the weather forecast which happened after reaching the moon. On the flip side, space travel consumes an ample amount of expense and some say that this has made a minimal impact on human life. Otherwise, money could be spent on the worthy activities on the ground such as feeding poor countries which can be controlled in the future. However, the space activities created multiple advances in areas of technology and science that further improve business activities today.

In conclusion, since the last human being left the moon several years ago, space programs had brought out numerous benefits and enhanced the quality of lifestyle to billions of individuals. I think such programs shall be continued for further great inventions.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 953, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e electronic device to another by humans Furthermore the successful launching of ...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Furthermore,
...ctronic device to another by humans Furthermore the successful launching of GEO satelli...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 569, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...urther improve business activities today In conclusion since the last human being...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, however, if, second, secondly, so, while, for instance, i think, in conclusion, such as, in my view

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 41.998997996 138% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1762.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 329.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.3556231003 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25891501996 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91039108883 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.577507598784 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 558.0 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 5.43587174349 0% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 1.0 16.0721442886 6% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 329.0 20.2975951904 1621% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 0.0 49.4020404114 0% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 1762.0 106.682146367 1652% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 329.0 20.7667163134 1584% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 117.0 7.06120827912 1657% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 8.67935871743 12% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0813170133699 0.244688304435 33% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0813170133699 0.084324248473 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0667982634062 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0435398166582 0.151304729494 29% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0307766261718 0.056905535591 54% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 168.3 13.0946893788 1285% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -270.92 50.2224549098 -539% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 0.0 7.44779559118 0% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 132.8 11.3001002004 1175% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 15.29 12.4159519038 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 24.75 8.58950901804 288% => Dale chall readability score is high.
difficult_words: 100.0 78.4519038076 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 60.0 9.78957915832 613% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 133.6 10.1190380762 1320% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 60.0 10.7795591182 557% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.