Foreign visitors should pay more than local visitors for cultural and historical attractions. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
Many tourists complaint about the high cost they spend when they visit famous spot. A number of people regard that the local visitors and the foreign visitors should pay the same when they travel historical attractions. I have a negative view toward this thought and believe it is irreversible for foreigner to spend more money.
For many people, the price for tickets or local productions is the main obstacle for them to travel other places. They spend loads of money in ticket, hotel and traffic which let them have less money to enjoy the travel itself. Not to mention some local people like to sell goods in different price to local people and to foreigners which spoil the travel experience. If make the price into the same level, then more people will be willing to travel and enjoy experience which only be obtained on a foreign soil.
However, the truth is, it is impossible for foreign visitors to spend less money even if the ticket price become the same toward local people and foreigners. Firstly, the foreign tourists have more things to consider when they travel to place where they unfamiliar. For example, they have to book ticket and hotel at first to make sure they will both have comfortable transportation and place to sleep. Also, to people who want to deep know in other culture, travel does not means to get on a plane, to stay in some hotel or to go sightseeing in some hot spots. To travel is to get to know the local people. So some time it also means tourists need to buy local foods or special gifts which local people are familiar to. Moreover, many countries need to earn money by tourists and it becomes the main source in governments’ income. If decreased the price for ticket, food and other services, obviously these governments may become poor.
Overall, I believe the spend in travel is hard to decline. If want to save money, the tourists can turn to internet or multi-media technology to help them know more about other culture.
- The graph below shows the alcohol-related deaths in 7 different countries and the average beer consumption in 2005.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the description of the correlation of the table that follows. 73
- The map below shows the changes in an American town between 1948 and 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and making comparisons where relevant. 73
- People attend colleges or universities for many different reasons (for example, new experiences, career preparation, increased knowledge etc.). Why do you think people attend colleges or universities? 61
- The table below gives information on internet use in six categories by age group.Describe the information in the table and make comparisons where appropriate. 78
- The pie charts below show units of electricity production by fuel source Australia and France in 1980 and 2000. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 6, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'tourists'' or 'tourist's'?
Suggestion: tourists'; tourist's
Many tourists complaint about the high cost they spen...
^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 476, Rule ID: DOES_X_HAS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'mean'? As 'do' is already inflected, the verb cannot also be inflected.
Suggestion: mean
... know in other culture, travel does not means to get on a plane, to stay in some hote...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 476, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[3]
Message: The verb 'does' requires base form of the verb: 'mean'
Suggestion: mean
... know in other culture, travel does not means to get on a plane, to stay in some hote...
^^^^^
Line 13, column 20, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...ay become poor. Overall, I believe the spend in travel is hard to decline. If want t...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, however, if, may, moreover, so, then, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1642.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 346.0 315.596192385 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.74566473988 5.12529762239 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31289638616 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44093581716 2.80592935109 87% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.482658959538 0.561755894193 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 505.8 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.1132809335 49.4020404114 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.5882352941 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3529411765 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.17647058824 7.06120827912 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.165694115549 0.244688304435 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.063608780314 0.084324248473 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0825330034439 0.0667982634062 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116917380911 0.151304729494 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0844109696692 0.056905535591 148% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.0946893788 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 50.2224549098 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.27 12.4159519038 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.32 8.58950901804 85% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 78.4519038076 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.