Foreign visitors should pay more than local visitors for cultural and historical attractions. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
It is striking that traveling abroad become more popular among tourists after the pandemic. Some people tend toward the viewpoint that overseas visitors should pay more than the resident population. I totally disagree with this idea.
As a matter of fact, cultural and historical attractions depend on state subsidies to keep them going, which also means that part of the money belongs to resident population taxes. Above and beyond, overseas sightseers contribute to the economic development of the host country with the money they spend on a diverse range of goods and services, including food, accommodation, travel, souvenirs,... Consequently, the government of every country should invest in and maintain those crucial tourist sites as well as encourage foreigners to visit them.
On the contrary, a growth in the cost of tourism in a certain country will adversely affect the tourism industry in that nation. If travelers realized that they would have to pay more to visit cultural and historical attractions in a particular nation, they would decide not to go to that place again. To take Korea as an example, right in the capital city, visitors can come to see many cultural and historical sites like Bukhansan National Park, Hanok Bukchon Village, Jogyesa Temple,...for free. That is why people tend to prefer Seoul over any other city. If there are no overseas travelers, it will affect the economic growth, in specific, the lack of funds for the maintenance of architectural works.
In conclusion, it seems to me that every effort should be made to attract tourists from overseas, then again making them pay more than residents is dishonest.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2023-04-02 | quang1944 | 73 | view |
2022-08-27 | Cggcgfhjghfj | 78 | view |
2022-08-27 | Cggcgfhjghfj | 61 | view |
2022-07-19 | qaengx12 | 73 | view |
2022-03-25 | HaleyLin2000 | 78 | view |
- Foreign visitors should pay more than local visitors for cultural and historical attractions To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 78
- Foreign visitors should pay more than local visitors for cultural and historical attractions To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 395, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , .
...g food, accommodation, travel, souvenirs,... Consequently, the government of every...
^^
Line 5, column 486, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , .
...k, Hanok Bukchon Village, Jogyesa Temple,...for free. That is why people tend to p...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, if, so, then, well, in conclusion, as a matter of fact, as well as, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1394.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 268.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.20149253731 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04607285448 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76803307938 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.623134328358 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 431.1 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.7091073724 49.4020404114 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.166666667 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3333333333 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 7.06120827912 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.252083530771 0.244688304435 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0814404600457 0.084324248473 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0670855653523 0.0667982634062 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.148145643164 0.151304729494 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0580308325365 0.056905535591 102% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.18 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.03 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.