Since the human being has experienced the Industrial Revolution, everything has evolved into extracting energy. Recently, the propensity to replace fossil fuel sources has been drastically expanded among demographic groups of countries trying to buffer the Planet against threats. This essay will argue why this tendency is entirely superior despite some inevitable drawbacks.
The majority of experts have always warned about and destiny of the earth. The contaminated environment is the result of human greed due to the excessive use of energy, whether it is future-oriented or not. There is no doubt that fossil fuels could be determined as one of the underlying aspects of pollution which currently toxify mother of nature; however, the reasonable price and world Wide access tempt countries to Never Give Up on this precious black treasure. Nevertheless, progressing development in developing countries lies in this fact either implicitly or explicitly, especially in such economic turmoil. Indeed, economic mobility not only might be confined to using this kind of energy but also mitigate nations' dependency on foreign superpowers. In another expression, roughly could the developing countries, which cover almost the whole world, anticipate their Salvation in a different path.
Despite the positive expanded effect which has been acquired in the past century, the capacity of the environment to recycling contaminations has reached out to the alarming point. Although the exorbitant costs should be allocated to renovate infrastructure to cutting-edge technology, the future undoubtedly belongs to these energy sources.
Countries should willingly Embrace these sustainable paradigms; otherwise, they will face an economic and environmental crisis in the future. There have been some reported instances of countries where using environment-friendly energies such as solar panels not only could boost their productivity but also introduce them as the best place for habitation day in day out. Admittedly, supporters of fossil fuels are manipulated by capitalism. At first, although they might be convinced that the petrol would bring a spectacular wealth, especially in Middle-earth countries, the bankruptcy, soil erosion, logging, and even co2 emission are more deeply felt after a while as the result of focusing on fossil fuels. After all, the earth would take its revenge if the current situation were neglected. Sustainable fuels not only could mitigate pollution but also affect people's overall health.
In conclusion, this essay discussed how necessary it is for the government to be aware of fossil fuel consequences. In my opinion, providing infrastructure for pure energy is imperative and entirely effect on future generations.
- You have seen an advertisement in an Australian magazine for someone to live with a family for six months and look after their six-year-old child.Write a letter to the parents. In your letter- Explain why you would like the job- Give details of why you wo 61
- Should young people follow older people’s example or it’s good for them to challenge older people’s opinions and thoughts. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 78
- People spend a lot of money on various things as they earn more money nowadays than before.Is it a positive or negative development? 67
- These days some people spend a lot of money on tickets to go to sporting or cultural events.Do you think this is a positive or negative development? 78
- Should young people follow older people’s example or it’s good for them to challenge older people’s opinions and thoughts. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 385, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled as one.
Suggestion: worldwide
...ture; however, the reasonable price and world Wide access tempt countries to Never Give Up...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 385, Rule ID: WORLD_WIDE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'worldwide'?
Suggestion: worldwide
...ture; however, the reasonable price and world Wide access tempt countries to Never Give Up...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, nevertheless, so, while, after all, in conclusion, kind of, no doubt, such as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 41.998997996 131% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2347.0 1615.20841683 145% => OK
No of words: 411.0 315.596192385 130% => OK
Chars per words: 5.7104622871 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.50256981431 4.20363070211 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11419365457 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 254.0 176.041082164 144% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.61800486618 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 741.6 506.74238477 146% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 8.0 2.52805611222 316% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.5492945551 49.4020404114 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.526315789 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6315789474 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.47368421053 7.06120827912 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.161007107886 0.244688304435 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0438138085918 0.084324248473 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.029439585291 0.0667982634062 44% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0814763546471 0.151304729494 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0271585474383 0.056905535591 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 50.2224549098 66% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.84 12.4159519038 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.25 8.58950901804 119% => OK
difficult_words: 145.0 78.4519038076 185% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.