Fossil fuels are the main source of energy around the world today. In some countries, the use of alternative sources of energy is replacing fossil fuels.
Is this a positive or negative development?
Many countries are supporting the implementation of various energy alternatives to reduce fossil fuels. I take the position that it is absolutely positive due to the eco-friendly and limitless attribute and the economic increase.
To begin with, the adoption of alternative energy sources is of greater importance to the health of the planet and infinity. To be specific, these energy sources create far lower carbon emission, which contributes to environmental protection. Furthermore, since the primary source originates from nature, they are everlasting. Green energy, therefore, will not contribute to the greenhouse effect and address climate crises like global warming. For example, solar panels can be used in the long term because sunlight is always abundant and emits no toxic gases. It will maintain the air quality, which does not cause a detrimental impact to human’s health, and preserve the flora and fauna existence.
In addition, embracing sustainable energy will boost the economy. Although the consumption of fossil fuels is widespread worldwide, these are limited amounts because they cannot be replenished easily. Some nations are dependent on imported fuels, which might be to blame for the economic recession. The solution for them is that they produce cost-effective green energy for in-house utilisation. This will generate job opportunities in manufacturing, engineering and installation, which alleviate unemployment. As a result, there will be a significant improvement of the nation’s economy in the long run.
To sum up, it is doubtless that renewable energy is being used as a substitute for conventional energy. It is believed to be an unlimited and environmentally friendly source, and a constructive step for the well-being of the country.
- Fossil fuels are the main source of energy around the world today In some countries the use of alternative sources of energy is replacing fossil fuels Is this a positive or negative development 67
- If old people are no longer physically mentally or financially able to look after themselves younger family members should be legally responsible for supporting them To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- Some people think students should study the science of food and how to prepare it Others think students should spend time on other important subjects Discuss in both views and give your opinion 61
- Some people think students should study the science of food and how to prepare it Others think that school time should be used in learning important subjects Discuss both views and give your opinion 84
- In the future nobody will buy printed newspapers or books because they will be able to read everything they want online without paying To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 78
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, if, so, therefore, well, for example, in addition, as a result, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1524.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 270.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.64444444444 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05360046442 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.23417111882 2.80592935109 115% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.62962962963 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 489.6 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 19.1209145963 49.4020404114 39% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 95.25 106.682146367 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.875 20.7667163134 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.625 7.06120827912 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.208517640993 0.244688304435 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0644598181615 0.084324248473 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0613367375107 0.0667982634062 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122427882121 0.151304729494 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0491860409183 0.056905535591 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.31 50.2224549098 76% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.14 12.4159519038 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.57 8.58950901804 123% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 78.4519038076 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, if, so, therefore, well, for example, in addition, as a result, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1524.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 270.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.64444444444 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05360046442 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.23417111882 2.80592935109 115% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.62962962963 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 489.6 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 19.1209145963 49.4020404114 39% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 95.25 106.682146367 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.875 20.7667163134 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.625 7.06120827912 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.208517640993 0.244688304435 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0644598181615 0.084324248473 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0613367375107 0.0667982634062 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122427882121 0.151304729494 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0491860409183 0.056905535591 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.31 50.2224549098 76% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.14 12.4159519038 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.57 8.58950901804 123% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 78.4519038076 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.