The existence of mankind enormous depends on natural resources, especially fossil fuels. Nowadays, thanks to the technological advances, people are encouraged to utilize some kind of alternative resources to relieve the burden on the environment. From the personal perspective, this is a positive trend which can bring numerous benefits for the development of society.
Admittedly, a large number of economy in the world have been affected by the abundance of fossil fuels. This is mainly because the difference in the geographical location, which leads to the dissimilarity in the natural resources, typically the distribution of fossil fuels. Take Japan as an example, due to located in the volcanic areas, this nation is known as the poor country in terms of natural resources, compared to other Africa regions, which is famous for the diversity of fossil fuels such as charcoal and oil. Therefore, in case of some developing countries, the government policies mostly rely on the international trade activities via exporting a large amount of fossil fuels to demand market. If this trend is continuous, in the long run, these countries will rapidly run out of their fossil fuels and the economies are able to stand in the edge of collapse.
Despite various merits that fossil fuels bring, stem from the drawbacks of limited and unrenewable, many governments have a tendency to switch to the use of alternative source of energy. This trend have positive impacts on not only the environment but also the society. On the environment level, over-exploitation will decrease, which can open a opportunity for the existence of natural resources in the future whereas still brings equivalent efficiency for some particular using purposes. For instance, instead of utilizing charcoal for heating, people can make use of the water power from damps and rivers to make electricity for the same goals. From the perspective of citizens, the limitation for not using fossil fuels not only good for the environment but also contributes to enhance the public health. Because of the exhaust gas and discharged components from natural resources after using process, alternative energy can tackle with this pressing concern. By applying modern technology in production, people need not to put up with serious consequences such as the climate change and global warming.
In conclusion, using alternative kind of energy is becoming a common feature in the modern world because it is beneficial for both the environment and people's living conditions
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 14, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...e development of society. Admittedly, a large number of economy in the world have been affected...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 198, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'has'.
Suggestion: has
...lternative source of energy. This trend have positive impacts on not only the enviro...
^^^^
Line 3, column 344, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...loitation will decrease, which can open a opportunity for the existence of natura...
^
Line 3, column 1025, Rule ID: NEEDNT_TO_DO_AND_DONT_NEED_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'put'?
Suggestion: put
...chnology in production, people need not to put up with serious consequences such as th...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, still, therefore, whereas, for instance, in conclusion, kind of, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 64.0 41.998997996 152% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.3376753507 216% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2132.0 1615.20841683 132% => OK
No of words: 401.0 315.596192385 127% => OK
Chars per words: 5.31670822943 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.47492842339 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96214216903 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 211.0 176.041082164 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.526184538653 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 684.9 506.74238477 135% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 4.76152304609 231% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 42.29283147 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.25 106.682146367 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0625 20.7667163134 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.6875 7.06120827912 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.257461231682 0.244688304435 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0748224647898 0.084324248473 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0487838897709 0.0667982634062 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.135504225469 0.151304729494 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0329370967994 0.056905535591 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 50.2224549098 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.44 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 116.0 78.4519038076 148% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.