Fossil fuels, such as coal, oil and natural gas, are the main source for many countries. However, some nations are using alternative energy such as solar power and wind power. Do you think this is a positive or negative development?
Fossil fuels still remain as a main source of energy for various countries throughout the world. However, developed nations have gradually shifted to alternative energy sources like solar and wind power. In my opinion, while there exists numerous issues at first, in the long-term, this change will be beneficial to the Earth.
On one hand, the most noticeable problem of this change is high cost. Investing in a new technology will undoubtedly need a huge amount of money, which can be a great issue for poor countries. Installation cost, meanwhile, can be the same or even higher than researching one. For instance, in Vietnam, the government may have to spend hundreds of millions of dollars to install just one wind field, as the process includes choosing the proper site, suitable technology, employment cost and so on. Such high costs have made shifting to modern energy a great threat to the country’s economy as the change can make the government go into debt.
However, alternative energy will still do more good than harm for the world in the future. The key argument is that renewable sources like solar and wind are stable; in other words, they are unlimited and do not emit carbon to the environment. Carbon dioxide is known to be the main cause of different environmental problems such as global warming, mass extinctions and ice melting at the poles, and reducing carbon emissions can alleviate the aforementioned issue and protect biodiversity. As a result, future generations can have a better living condition, get rid of pollution issues and have a sustainable life thanks to renewable energy. This advantage obviously outweighs the foreseen problem of money.
In conclusion, I believe that renewable energy should be gradually applied to all nations in the world, and nations should unite to research and develop this crucial technology together to make the Earth a better place for humanity.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-21 | Phuong1810 | 67 | view |
| 2023-08-21 | Phuong1810 | 61 | view |
| 2023-08-21 | Phuong1810 | 56 | view |
| 2021-11-17 | cat silver 602 | 89 | view |
| 2021-10-01 | bui12345 | 84 | view |
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, may, so, still, while, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as a result, in my opinion, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 9.0 24.0651302605 37% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1610.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 314.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.12738853503 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20951839842 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77815820439 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.592356687898 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 501.3 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.5607930623 49.4020404114 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.0 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4285714286 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.78571428571 7.06120827912 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.221677138887 0.244688304435 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0780865817069 0.084324248473 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0799330000731 0.0667982634062 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.145149244984 0.151304729494 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0839285023464 0.056905535591 147% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.77 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.15 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.