In the future all cars, buses and trucks will be driverless. The only people travelling inside these vehicles will be passengers.
Do you think the advantages of driverless vehicles outweigh the disadvantages?
In the coming decades, it is generally assumed that all the transportation vehicles would be automized with no human driver and the people will be taking the back seat. Personally, traveling with driverless cars and buses can bring more benefits to people than the fallback if precautions were made carefully.
Regarding the advantages, using autonomous vehicles will certainly lessen the frequency of car accidents since they are primarily caused by human drivers. There will be no alcohol drinking issue, poor eyesight, or sleepy driver problem in traveling with robotic cars. Besides, if the individual gets drunk, he can literally sit in the behind and let the system drive safely back to his place. Moreover, more chances for locomotion or traveling experiences for people with disabilities, obese persons, or people with walking problems. With automobile cars, people would not have to worry about the aforementioned individuals in their family and enjoy the trips together. Moreover, time to do additional tasks will be saved using driverless cars. Particularly for businessmen, the most appealing aspect of using such cars is that they can do their work efficiently such as reading meeting materials or planning the schedule, without needing to pay attention to the traffic outside.
However, it is important to be aware that the coin has two sides. As for the drawback of it, the social uprising will be possible if the stakeholders do not have plausible backup plans for human drivers. Since the drivers will be substituted by machines, the government has to be able to create more alternative employment opportunities for those who will be losing jobs. The next thing to put into consideration is cyber-security. Technically, the whole transportation system will be performed by machines or the Internet, the safety of the information or the performance of the materials involved come to play a significant role in maintaining the efficiency of automated vehicles.
To sum up, substituting contemporary vehicles with driverless ones in the future will ensure the security of the passenger and promote the lifestyles to be more productive. It is safe to conclude that the positive aspects have an upper hand over the negative regarding the given statement.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-08-10 | brew | 73 | view |
| 2024-08-09 | brew | 73 | view |
| 2023-08-28 | Daniel3003 | 67 | view |
| 2023-08-26 | aliceali | 56 | view |
| 2023-06-20 | butterflyluo | 73 | view |
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010 73
- Some people feel that the design of newly constructed buildings in big cities should be controlled by governments Others believe those who finance the construction of a building should be free to design it as they see fit Discuss both these views and give 73
- The chart below shows the total number of minutes in billions of telephone calls in the UK divided into three categories from 1995 2002 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main feature and make comparison where relevant 78
- Some people think that a sense of competition in children should be encouraged Others believe that children who are taught to co operate rather than compete become more useful adults Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 84
- The graph shows Underground Station passenger numbers in London Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 981, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...o pay attention to the traffic outside. However, it is important to be aware tha...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, however, if, moreover, regarding, so, as for, as to, such as, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1916.0 1615.20841683 119% => OK
No of words: 360.0 315.596192385 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.32222222222 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35587717469 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04136096891 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 208.0 176.041082164 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.577777777778 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 612.0 506.74238477 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.2823068904 49.4020404114 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.75 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 7.06120827912 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.338001085244 0.244688304435 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106351968528 0.084324248473 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0857608500106 0.0667982634062 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.217833193871 0.151304729494 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.039200961571 0.056905535591 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.0946893788 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.38 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 78.4519038076 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.