With the passage of time observing the thriving of technology, there are no disputes that humans can forecast the phenomenon of driverless means of transportation; passengers will be steered wheels by artificial intelligence. From my perspective, this will pose both threats and praiseworthy advantages as it merely bounds to happen.
On the first hand, the replacement will bring about much more benefits for vehicle users in terms of efficiency and safety. Advanced technology with high fidelity and synchronized system superseding human beings, a vulnerable and hypothetically irrational operator, will embark travelers on a more safe and smooth journey. By all means, it ought to effectively reduce the rate of vehicle accidents and increase the betterment of vehicle services. Because of its consistency and synchronized cloud system, vehicles will surely adjust the driving speed which ensures a suggestive distance from other cars. In the pretext of the alignments it performs, traffic jams and bad roads can be avoidable; users are guaranteed the fastest movements and on-time arrival at destinations.
On the other hand, bigger problems will crop up. For the reason that employment is the cornerstone of transportation pillars, the crux of the concern, understandably, pivots to whether driver users can become abundant. The aftermath leaves windows for millions of these blue-collar workers struggling to find new jobs. Moreover, bearing in mind that technology is a hardcore non-interactive machinery, users that look forward to their time spent humanly chitchatting on public transport or suffer from technophobia are not in favor of this modern innovation.
In conclusion, there is a sharp contrast between the two sides of the coin. Although the risks abound within, it can be without saying that this advancement will staggeringly loom out of the dark; the pros surely surpass the cons in the debate.
- Most people accept that we now live in a globalized world but not everyone agrees that it is beneficial To what extent is globalization a positive or negative development 11
- In the future no one buy a printed newspaper or books because they able to read everything that they want online without payment To what extent do you agree or disagree with the statement 89
- In the future all cars buses and trucks will be driverless The only people travelling inside these vehicles will be passengers Do you think the advantages of driverless vehicles outweigh the disadvantages 89
- today more people are travelling than ever before why is this case what are the benefits of travelingfor travelers 78
- Ecological balance is impossible to achieve when technological progress constantly ruins our environment Do you agree 11
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, look, moreover, so, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1631.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 296.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.51013513514 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12660294901 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 176.041082164 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.648648648649 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 495.0 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.5722473196 49.4020404114 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.461538462 106.682146367 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7692307692 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.84615384615 7.06120827912 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.214147253288 0.244688304435 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0649320293876 0.084324248473 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0480187926396 0.0667982634062 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115221545788 0.151304729494 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0631401674123 0.056905535591 111% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.97 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.22 8.58950901804 119% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 78.4519038076 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 17.0 9.78957915832 174% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.