In the future, it seems more difficult to live on the earth. Some people think more money should be spent on researching other plants to live in, such as Mars. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
There is no disputing fact that in years to come, existing on our planet will be more problematic and some people believe that investing the national budget in exploring other plants such as Mars is crucial. From my perspective, this idea is feasible.
To begin with, one of the significant advantages of researching the universe is to allow humans to discover new land. The earth is facing a lack of land and accommodation and people are residing in small and narrow places leading to the high demand for exploring different planets with the hope of searching for a new place or home. For example, uninterrupted needs for places of residence occur in some countries like India which has the high rate of homeless people. Furthermore, detecting new planets assists in enhancing the amenity of life for human-being. Due to the depletion of natural resources and energy including wood, coal, oil, and water which will be run out of one day, finding a new source of energy sate human demand and boost production as well as economic growth which could act as a precursor for people’s life.
Moreover, another fundamental reason for pouring national budget into researching the universe is the advantage of space exploration and study in anticipating unforeseen hazards outside the earth. Therefore, mankind could propose solutions to prevent and protect from being injured or even extinct. This can be illustrated by the fact that Nasa gives warnings about meteoroids or climate change caused by the sun and other planets.
In conclusion, for the reason I have mentioned above, I believe it is vital that the national budget should be invested in universe study so as to explore new habitable environments which will replace hostile living conditions in the future.
- The diagrams give information about changes in a student accommodation building 73
- A growing number of people feel that animals should not be exploited by people and that they should have the same rights while others argue that animals should be exploited to satisfy mankind s various needs Discuss both views and give your opinion 84
- The plan below shows the village of Pebbleton 20 years ago and now 61
- In the future it seems more difficult to live on the earth Some people think more money should be spent on researching other plants to live in such as Mars To what extent do you agree or disagree 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 10, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...recursor for people’s life. Moreover, another fundamental reason for pouring n...
^^
Line 7, column 139, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...et should be invested in universe study so as to explore new habitable environments whic...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, moreover, so, therefore, well, as to, for example, in conclusion, such as, as well as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1484.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 291.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.09965635739 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78201563812 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.611683848797 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 471.6 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 67.8525382145 49.4020404114 137% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.909090909 106.682146367 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.4545454545 20.7667163134 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.6363636364 7.06120827912 151% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.134354061385 0.244688304435 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0469887518508 0.084324248473 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0541061163598 0.0667982634062 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0927260140702 0.151304729494 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0519646500647 0.056905535591 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 50.2224549098 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.6 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.43 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.