The diagrams give information about changes in a student accommodation building
A glimpse at the pictures provided depicts the information about a number of changes which took place in a student accommodation building during the period of twelve years starting from 2010 to the present day.
Overall, what stands out from the maps is that the garden which is situated at the bottom of the diagram was cleared to make way for a new car-parking area.
Looking at the plan in greater detail, the bathroom which is directly opposite the hallway remains unchanged. Additionally, the student-bedroom residing in the south and east of the accommodation was also unchanged.
In 2010, the living room which is located at the top of the map was in a close proximity to the garden. By contrast, it was replaced by another student-bedroom in the current time. Another striking change is that there was an erection of a student-bedroom at the top left-hand corner of the diagram; furthermore, the site also witnessed an introduction of the en-suite room that is in front of the main entrance.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-02 | Giang Tran | view | |
| 2024-11-02 | Giang Tran | view | |
| 2024-11-02 | Giang Tran | view | |
| 2024-11-02 | Giang Tran | view | |
| 2024-11-02 | Giang Tran | view |
- The plan below shows the village of Pebbleton 20 years ago and now 61
- A growing number of people feel that animals should not be exploited by people and that they should have the same rights while others argue that animals should be exploited to satisfy mankind s various needs Discuss both views and give your opinion 84
- In the future it seems more difficult to live on the earth Some people think more money should be spent on researching other plants to live in such as Mars To what extent do you agree or disagree 67
- The diagrams give information about changes in a student accommodation building 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 74, Rule ID: CLOSE_SCRUTINY[1]
Message: Use simply 'proximity'.
Suggestion: proximity
... located at the top of the map was in a close proximity to the garden. By contrast, it was repl...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 414, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... that is in front of the main entrance.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, look, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 6.8 15% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 835.0 965.302439024 87% => OK
No of words: 170.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.91176470588 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61087313685 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04851770663 2.65546596893 115% => OK
Unique words: 97.0 106.607317073 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.570588235294 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 250.2 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.8683024363 43.030603864 128% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.285714286 112.824112599 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.2857142857 22.9334400587 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.85714285714 5.23603664747 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.221840290161 0.215688989381 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0923109299319 0.103423049105 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0950092297534 0.0843802449381 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128864844424 0.15604864568 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0982742619832 0.0819641961636 120% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.73 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.