In the future, there will be a higher proportion of older people than young people in many countries. Is it a positive or negative effects.
It is said that in recent times with the development of many countries around the world. Many scientists that in the future the percentage of elder people will be higher than young people. Although this trend can be have some advantages, the drawbacks may be far more significant.
On the one hand, there can be some minor benefits of enormous proportion of older people. First and foremost, elder people have vast knowledge as well as wisdom which can help them to solve not only the problems but also make decisions more easier.Therefore, in many big enterprises the leaders are usually old people because the can convey their knowledge to their employees. Secondly, in many families, grandparents can to care for their grandchildren.As a matter of fact, nowadays, with the fast paced life parents have to spend many times on working, so they do not have enough times to care for their children.
On the other hand, there can be some major downsides of high number of old people in many countries. Perhaps one of these is that high number of younger can directly affect the nation economy. This means the reduction in amount of taxes. The reason for this is that they when they entire, they can not pay the taxes but the nations also need to invest money in building health care centers as well as provide money for them to live. Furthermore, with many conflicts in the world, the low in number of younger can be very dangerous to the independence of many nations. This is because the younger are not only stronger but also faster than the old, so they can be able to adapt the extreme conditions.
In conclusion, it is undeniable that enormous number of elder people can be beneficial in some situations. However, the drawbacks involved are of greater significance.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-01-28 | tranlequihoang | 73 | view |
| 2023-01-28 | tranlequihoang | 56 | view |
| 2023-01-28 | tranlequihoang | 73 | view |
| 2023-01-28 | tranlequihoang | 56 | view |
| 2023-01-28 | tranlequihoang | 56 | view |
- Companies and private invididuals not government should pay to clean up the pollution that they produced 56
- Companies and private invididuals not government should pay to clean up the pollution that they produced 56
- In the future there will be a higher proportion of older people than young people in many countries Is it a positive or negative effects 61
- It is sometimes said that countries should produce all the food for their populations to eat and import as little as possible To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- In the future there will be a higher proportion of older people than young people in many countries Is it a positive or negative effects 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 236, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'easier' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: easier
...ly the problems but also make decisions more easier.Therefore, in many big enterprises the ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 248, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Therefore
...ems but also make decisions more easier.Therefore, in many big enterprises the leaders ar...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 454, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: As
...nts can to care for their grandchildren.As a matter of fact, nowadays, with the fa...
^^
Line 3, column 130, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... countries. Perhaps one of these is that high number of younger can directly affe...
^^^
Line 3, column 200, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...directly affect the nation economy. This means the reduction in amount of taxes. ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, in conclusion, as a matter of fact, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1466.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 306.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.7908496732 5.12529762239 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18244613648 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67766538647 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.561755894193 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 456.3 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 65.8522232436 49.4020404114 133% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.714285714 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8571428571 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.9285714286 7.06120827912 155% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.238743788162 0.244688304435 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.095889558464 0.084324248473 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.116322517848 0.0667982634062 174% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.169159678076 0.151304729494 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.101351532278 0.056905535591 178% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 50.2224549098 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.5 12.4159519038 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.39 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.