The gap between the wealthy to the underprivileged is indeed expanding all around the world. There are several reasons which explain this issue and some measures should be taken to tackle these causes.
There are two fundamental reasons why the disparity is widening. The first reason is that the lack of works in the lower and middle classes poses a great financial threat to them. Because the requirements and criteria for both national and multinational corporations are too high, people are not likely to have many chances to work for them. Consequently, many people become unemployed and unable to earn a living. The second reason is that the infrastructure is not enough convenient for people to approach. For instance, residents in rural areas have to live without electricity, clean water. Thus, these people who are not well-educated are likely to become destitute.
In response, some measures should be taken to mitigate the problem of the unbridgeable gap between the two classes. One step is that businesses should create many positions for their recruitment. If people easily have a job after their graduation, unemployment rates will shrink. Therefore, the disparity can be reduced thanks to the fact that the lower class can earn more money. Another essential measure is that Governments should improve the infrastructure in their countries. If the authorities know how to narrow the disparity, their countries will develop successfully. For example, Singapore, which was a poor fishing village in the nineteenth century, is the centre of economy in the world after 50 years.
In conclusion, the disparity between the wealthy and the destitute is a huge problem for the modern life of human being and solutions should be implemented to tackle this issue.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, if, second, so, therefore, thus, well, for example, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 13.1623246493 160% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1488.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 285.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.22105263158 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10876417139 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91373035153 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.550877192982 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 464.4 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.8101257732 49.4020404114 60% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.5294117647 106.682146367 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.7647058824 20.7667163134 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.88235294118 7.06120827912 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.132245620278 0.244688304435 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0406728433354 0.084324248473 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.040307433303 0.0667982634062 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.07996893559 0.151304729494 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0172594901014 0.056905535591 30% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.0946893788 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.7 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.42 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.