Despite agricultural advancements, numerous people on Earth still encounter food scarcity. This essay will cast light on the rationales behind this phenomenon and give some holistic approaches to deal with the food shortage.
To begin with, two fundamental reasons which trigger the shortage of food should be taken into consideration. The first reason is that wars among nations and groups of people may wreak havoc on farming. To be more specific, although a huge amount of food production is reaped, it can be destroyed intentionally or unintentionally by the devastation of booms and toxic chemicals used in such conflicts. Another reason is a waste of food. Every year, for example, millions of tons of grain are thrown out wastefully in rich countries, this surplus food could have saved millions of disadvantaged people from starvation.
From the aforementioned causes, some feasible solutions should be taken to curb this situation. First, governments should encourage agricultural companies and farmers to adopt state-of-the-art inventions such as genetic engineering technology and vertical farming. Thanks to those inventions, people may produce more food than ever, which in turn deter them from devastating famines. Second, governments should launch campaigns to raise people’s awareness of the importance of food saving. As a matter of fact that if food is used appropriately and properly, there may be no chance for a food crisis.
In conclusion, famines still occur in some nations despite the advances in farming. Only when the concerted endeavors are made by governments and organizations are taken, can this thorny issue be resolved successfully.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 607, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... of disadvantaged people from starvation From the aforementioned causes some feas...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, may, second, so, still, for example, in conclusion, such as, as a matter of fact, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1379.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 257.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.36575875486 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00390054096 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00445046302 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.607003891051 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 427.5 506.74238477 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 5.43587174349 0% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 1.0 16.0721442886 6% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 257.0 20.2975951904 1266% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 0.0 49.4020404114 0% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 1379.0 106.682146367 1293% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 257.0 20.7667163134 1238% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 106.0 7.06120827912 1501% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 8.67935871743 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.182321028943 0.244688304435 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.182321028943 0.084324248473 216% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0667982634062 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.123462850305 0.151304729494 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0216526904929 0.056905535591 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 132.4 13.0946893788 1011% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -197.84 50.2224549098 -394% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 0.0 7.44779559118 0% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 104.7 11.3001002004 927% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 15.35 12.4159519038 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 21.24 8.58950901804 247% => Dale chall readability score is high.
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 60.0 9.78957915832 613% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 104.8 10.1190380762 1036% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 105.0 10.7795591182 974% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.